Maybe they just wanted to deny the positive feedback to him.

No, that’s the point of the meme. They’re using confusing buttons.

Example: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969725022776?via=ihub

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972726000978?via=ihub

but the original is not available for download on the publisher’s site.

Here’s the one I made screenshots of for the meme: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969725022776?via=ihub

center red button or the orange button at the bottom.

Same.

It wasn’t, the full-size is usually smaller, but I always forget to ignore it.

When you read more papers from that publisher, you’ll get it.

Time to evolve that bookshelf.

look up the “carnivore diet” or “lion diet”.

It’s the ultimate form of LARP-ing as carnivores.

Don’t bother, that user is the moderator of “Friendly Carnivore@discuss.online”

You might want to update your literature.

“ImAcArNIVorE”

lmao. What a pretext!

Imagine being a researcher and not keeping the original images over the figures sent with a paper.

And wouldn’t they have the upload to the AI slop platform? Or did they also delete that chat?

They could show the original images…

Does this mean that the exploitation of bees by humans will stop?

It’s bourgeois.

It’s a good call.

Yes.

In a market context, the price of fossil hydrocarbons must go up.

In a non-market context, it depends on what tools are available.

Let’s fucking go!