If you had read anything you’d know the primary goal of the new, more frequent, release schedule is to move to smaller and therefore less buggy releases.

The problem is (and has always been) SoC kernel support.

I’m not saying there is anything there, but I never trust the search on GitHub under any circumstances. It routinely doesn’t find things I am positive exist on my own code bases.

It would be cool if you read the first paragraph

Android 10+ devices via Play services

Bitwarden works well in every app and browser I’ve tried.

That makes no sense. Wouldn’t that make Android 15 B and 16 C?

I’ve used Android Auto for years on different Pixels but I’ve never seen a “safety break”. Maybe it’s the car?

Not when devices with rolling screens are on the horizon.

You underestimate the opportunity of selling a single device that costs significantly more than both combined (this one literally does).

Idk about no crease but Samsung’s appear to be the most noticeable from what I’ve actually seen. I think other manufacturers have improved on this over time but I haven’t seen anything newer than my Pixel Fold in person.

IIRC display and chip manufacturing are basically treated like separate businesses from the phones as a product. And all the other companies foldables are better than Samsung’s (imo at least) because they haven’t innovated or improved in several generations.

I’m not a Samsung fan by any stretch, but this I would love to see.

Android Automotive OS is a blank slate for car manufacturers to customize and claim is their own creation, consumers will never know it exists.

It’s definitely not great, but considering one is for consumers and the other is explicitly not it’s not that bad.

Well yeah, it’s pretty common knowledge that all those cheap TV boxes running AOSP (not Android TV) are crap and should be avoided.

I like it. Not sure the search entry in the list needs to always be on screen but it’s fine.

Tablet sized screen when you want/need it, normal sized phone when you don’t, in your pocket all the time.

I think you mean “tri fold”.

This thing costs $2800…

That’s not how it works. Other apps (ironically including Google’s RCS implementation) use the Signal Protocol. Simply using it doesn’t magically make your app interoperable with every other app that uses it. And Apple would be the last company to go out of their way to make it work.

Nobody here is against open standards or FOSS apps. I am actually lucky/privileged enough to be able to write open source code for a living.

You seem to not understand the reality of the situation and that use case other than yours exist.

Huh? No it wouldn’t. If Apple implemented the Signal protocol they would still have to publish an iMessage app to the Play Store for Android users.

Call Google’s messaging app proprietary all you want but at least their implementation of RCS is E2E encrypted.