This dovetails nicely with my theory that Jesus hasn’t come back yet because we invented the nailgun.
This dovetails nicely with my theory that Jesus hasn’t come back yet because we invented the nailgun.
This is possible if you use a TimeCube, but I get the feeling you’re already familiar.
Pretty sure Jesus was a stoner and party monster. He was always getting invited to rich guys’ houses for dinner and the Pharisees always accused him of being drunk when he argued with them. His favorite woman was a lady of negotiable affection. Plus, only a stoner could come up with “yeah but, you’ve got a whole log in your eye, maaaan.”
Why they gotta do Marika dirty like that?
I always forget about that. Also we call anoraks “windbreakers”, which…
Sometimes my mom calls a fanny pack a strap-on. This is like that.
Ugh.
Pretty much yeah. I was going to say an episode of Fear Factor but same thing.
If you read it the right way, the book of Jonah reads like a really weird episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm.
Yeah. Also, superficially good looking people can still be sketchy weirdos. Vibe, context, and prior relationship are much more important than looks. Of course, some people can’t get their head around this and start blaming literally anything else: their height, their bone structure, a worldwide conspiracy against them. It’s crazy.
Or, like, make mana fall from heaven or give the pastors the occasional plague of quail to handle food requirements.
Oh good it’s not just me.
Shame about all the Kanye on the track.
I became a dad late (around middle age) and was telling dad jokes way before that. My theory is it’s less about becoming a father and more about getting older and just wanting to annoy people for my own amusement.
He found it in the wilderness? That seems easy to narrow down and verify.
As someone whose employer is strongly pushing them to use AI assistants in coding: no. At best, it’s like being tied to a shitty intern that copies code off stack overflow and then blows me up on slack when it magically doesn’t work. I still don’t understand why everyone is so excited about them. The only tasks they can handle competently are tasks I can easily do on my own (and with a lot less re-typing.)
Sure, they’ll grow over the years, but Altman et al are complaining that they’re running out of training data. And even with an unlimited body of training data for future models, we’ll still end up with something about as intelligent as a kid that’s been locked in a windowless room with books their whole life and can either parrot opinions they’ve read or make shit up and hope you believe it. I’ll think we’ll get a series of incompetent products with increasing ability to make wrong shit up on the fly until C-suite moves on to the next shiny bullshit.
That’s not to say we’re not capable of creating a generally-intelligent system on par with or exceeding human intelligence, but I really don’t think LLMs will allow for that.
tl;dr: a lot of woo in the tech community that the linux community isn’t as on board with
is that james van der beek
It kind of does that for everybody?
Yeah well Chuck Norris didn’t invent the rolling office chair.
Also, apparently the party of “humans can affect climate”.