Say that to the English, (or rather to all of their victims). A boat has historically been a pretty effective medium for spreading negativity.
Say that to the English, (or rather to all of their victims). A boat has historically been a pretty effective medium for spreading negativity.
I’m voting for the same party as a world-historic war criminal so like that’s saying something.
At first I was at least impressed that it came up with such a hilarious idea, but then it of course turns out (just as with the pizza glue) it just stole it from somewhere else.
Yes, and don’t forget to donate to be extra sure. Donate that little money you safe from your three sharing economy jobs (after you payed your rent to Blackstone) to the Democrats, so they can pay a consultant ghoul a six figure salary to think of a new way to market genocide denial.
And the way to change it is to Vote Vote Vote! Vote for the Democrats! This time they are really gonna do it.
You could word it that way, or you could say: man who was driven everywhere by a chauffeur formalized the taking over of shared pedestrian spaces to car only spaces.
Also I have yet to learn of a member of the skull and bones society that was a good person.
“It’s a big club and you ain’t in it”, in this case refers to the safari club.
I’m not in favor of gunboat diplomacy, but if the US is doing it anyway (to enable genocide) I would rather have them do something useful with it.
And using a military to enforce policy does not equal conquering the world, it’s at the end of the escalation ladder, diplomatic pressure then sanctions, embargoes, support regime change, militarily blockades, limiting military operations, and finally full on invasion. These are all things the US is already doing but then for nefarious reasons.
Here is an idea, how about the US uses its military to enforce a minimum wealth tax worldwide to end tax competition, instead of to enable its proxies to commit war crimes.
Why?
Edit: atheism debunked question mark. Nobody wants to have a discussion based logic and reason here? Very sad…
Respect for turning an awful boomer meme into a reasonable programming meme with just two words.
He is like a never-Trump republican, his problem isn’t with the policy (or the cruelty there of), but rather with the lack of decorum and breaking of norms.
Big-o’dickus
The real crime being committed here. Normal country.
They used the term ‘nongovernmental combatant’ (aka terrorist), because a war can only be between states these combatants were not legally POW and thus had no right whatsoever.
I wouldn’t have gotten the joke otherwise, maybe add a red circle and a laughing minion next time to be extra clear.
Being gay or trans is not dependent on being out or not.
And focusing on the LGBTQ aspect of Israels current onslaught is relevant to the extent that Israel actively propagandizes “spreading” gay rights in Gaza, while at the same time murdering LGBTQ individuals indiscriminately. The fact that pink washing is a strategy used to justify genocide makes it that much more important to reject this during pride.
Could it be that our ally is running an extermination campaign against a civilian population? No, that’s impossible. They all have to be terrorists, and contacting terrorists is against our terms of service.
The Dutch and the French both have many Belgian jokes (all along the lines that Belgians are dumb), but the funny thing is that many of the jokes actually originate from Belgium itself. They are jokes by the Flemish and Walloons making fun of each other that are then generalized to Belgians as a whole by the Dutch and French.
Source: https://youtu.be/_Ms37HuTZ9s?si=pWuSBO6-4GlIZPiZ