“Tech” is a conflated term. The way I read OP is that they don’t want their cars main user interface to be a smartphone app. Doesn’t mean the car can’t be technologically advanced.
Sure, in the same way volcanologists could mutate to survive being submerged in lava.
I’ve heard the exact same analogy applied to alcohol killing bacteria and it doesn’t convince me
This kid will start pushing this boundary in like 3 weeks (like every kid pushes every damn boundary all the time) and then OP will have a problem on their hands, when the kid decides that OP is toothless.
576 rankine
Personally, my brain manages to filter out anything with a leading underscore (I don’t know the origin offhand, I think some system I worked with at some point used those on files that I knew I didn’t care about). So when coworkers use leading underscores it slows me down a bit.
It does work though
Tangential, but Blind Guardian has one
deleted by creator
It’s not obvious to me how these things are related, could you elaborate?
deleted by creator
I’m lacking context or something because I don’t understand why that is so significant.
Yes this is absurd, but it’s a (serious) scientific community issue, not a search engine issue.
Can you please elaborate?
Now the engineers and/or scientists are crying
I see “taxes” a lot but I have never seen someone explain the mechanism by which this is supposed to work.
The only thing I can come up with in my head is that they have capitalized the development costs and are currently depreciating the resulting asset. And that by cancelling/delisting the games it may allow them to immediately depreciate the rest of it, thereby recognizing a large expense for the current tax year, reducing profit, and therefore taxes.
Is that how this is supposed to work?
So you see the issue and have a workaround. Good! But that doesn’t mean that, as you said, “it’s not the cables that are the issue.” Why throw them away if they’re not an issue?
I’m on a prepaid plan so I run out sometimes. Worth it for $15/mo service
Yeah Tildes is exactly what OP is looking for. It was designed from the start to facilitate discussions and suppress memes
I tried looking this up and could not find a source to support this claim, do you have one you could share?
Fair. When I read “no one actually wants to use nukes” I think “no nuclear power’s public geopolitical doctrine involves a nuclear first strike.” But individuals will not necessarily toe that line.