The lack of adoption is well understood: very few devices ship with Linux pre-installed, and most people don’t care about the os.

That project of yours is great. But that isn’t why ppl object to ai.

The problem with ai is the massively ramped number of unnecessary undisclosed issues with software that normally take human review, sometimes in multiple rounds.

AI only democratized the coding. All the rest of the cost of making software is absorbed by by nothing. No one is getting code parsed, or human reviewed before putting it out in the wild.

So it’s awesome to make stuff for yourself, but it’s not appropriate to share with others without that code review.

The world is a complex place and two things can be true at the same time.

This is all true.

However, I’ve had my subdomains since 2008 and never had any kind of issue, so I can vouch for freedns.

They’re an emblem of the spirit of what the internet should be.

Just live with a terrible name and it will keep being free. I’ve had my mooo.com subdomains for years.

Come on, I like supporting n00bs, but this is low effort, bullshit trolling.

“I’ve tried nothing and I’m all out of ideas.”

And this person comes back to this linux community again and again with “my pirated games don’t work”. So many of us try to help this person, but they dont want a solution, they want to be disruptive.

In my dealings with json output, jq gets the job done.

Can’t sort your files by file name with that, though.

ISO 8601. For your health.

RCS is off-topic.

Disagree, it serves to illustrate the same kind of monopoly google has on push notifications.

UnifiedPush is not a push service, it is a distributor. It is a proxy for push services, it does not send out its own notifications.

Also, ntfy does not need to use unified push, it simply makes put or post notifications, like it does in the self-hosted version. The public instance of ntfy does use unified push, yes. For instance, I do not want my http push notifications flying around in plain text with notifications about my private services being up or down, so I don’t use one. I arrange the connectivity to my applications myself.

Here again, google has done us all a disservice by obscuring the difference.

That is correct.

However, this is a quasi-monopoly by google having quietly overwhelmed the space. Same thing for RCS messaging.

Neither push notifications nor RCS are proprietary, so there is a possibility to tear oneself from google here.

For instance, there are several free and paid push notifications services. Pushbullet is a popular paid one, not too expensive. I personally use https://ntfy.sh/, which can be self-hosted.

RCS is different because trusting the encryption keys makes RCS work, so there would have to be a critical mass of buy-in to use an alternative to google’s RCS implementation.

The EU made your life easier with USBC for everything, I don’t think you’re paying more for the privilege.

As others have mentioned here, there is a lot of natural overlap with vps renting, hardware re-use, gerenal approaches to managing infrastructure, docker, and Linux in general. I don’t even mind networking questions here.

When questions stray in that aren’t really that relevant, like beginner Linux questions, someone is generally nice enough to point to a more appropriate community.

What I think wastes time in this community are the gatekeeping topics like “your vps isnt self-hosting”.

Awesome.

Reminds me of the pain setting up mythtv, but thr rewards were worth it.

Well, seems like it was time well spent in any case.

If you have classic upstream buffer bloat, there are a couple of traffic shaping algorithms (cake and fq_codel) that work really well with the majority of competent routers, including opnsense/pfsense.

Traffic shaping is definitely a can of worms, but fun to learn.

Wow, you diagnosed buffer bloat and applied the fix to your LAN side? Sooo much work…

The problem is unlikely to have been on the proxmox side. Multiqueue only allows virtio to multithread TCP connections via the host CPU using more than one virtual cpu, but this is essentially like aggregating a network link; it will increase bandwidth, but not throughput. Besides, the actual limit for the proxmox internal bridge and virtio NICs is “whatever the cpu can manage”, which is sometimes over 10Gb. It’s unlikely to be slowing down traffic coming from your vms.

Good lord. If you’re trying to recreate cicada 3301, it’s not going well.

That’s because only one interface is really being used. A TCP session will reset if the hop count or metric changes all the time, the SYN/ACK wouldn’t work.

Oh, you are failing one over if the other fails? That’s not the same thing as configuring two interfaces with the same IP, gateway, at the same time, which is what I thought you were trying to do.

Is it possible to configure interfaces this way? Yes.

Will it work? No, not without bonding, and not with WiFi as one of the interfaces.

You are trying to de-jargon topics, and that’s fine, but the two following categories do not help, they are localized habits and don’t have any value to non-english or nontechnical people, or both:

• shortenings: a11y for accessibility is not a common contraction, it’s not helpful for anyone to understand the term itself
• names of services: CF for cloudflare is not something worth defining. Names change, and you wouldn’t see this in a professional document. It’s like defining “lol”, the acronym is shorthand in typed communication, not technical jargon.

Side note, DNS stands for domain name system, it has never meant domain name service.

I personally find bots annoying, half the content on the internet is already bots.