• 5 Posts
  • 2.37K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 16th, 2025

help-circle
  • Cofnas wasn’t connected to the investigative reporting by Times Higher Education last autumn which found 68 pages of comparison between Arday’s papers and his students’ - with typos intact. It also uncoveed evidence he had falsified a medical study he authored. The piece was spiked following a SLAPP threat from notorious lawfare firm Carter-Ruck, on instructions from Arday.

    The first Cambridge investigation made the mistake of discounting the allegations against Arday because the complaint had been brought by another racist. This despite the investigation having found copious corroborative evidence from Arday’s colleagues, who were deeply concerned by his comduct.






  • I think theres more nuance. For nearly two decades he actively courted press attention, constructing a striking self-mythology that almost dared disbelief.

    He was happy enough with that until last year when investigative journalists actually began questioning his methods and claims, at which point he engaged the services of notorious SLAPP law firm Carter-Ruck to intimidate them into silence.

    At a time when there are concerns of AI-hallucinated studies and deep cutbacks in the university sector, his downfall amid accusations of fabricated evidence and plagiarism was newsworthy. He didn’t deserve that end, but scrutiny was merited.






  • Not quite. He was exonerated by the vaguest of “investigations” which only considered that a complaint came from a racist, and discarded out of hand the concerns of his colleagues about his behaviour. There is growing pressure for Cambridge to mount an independent investigation into the first investigation.

    Arday then hired the elite law firm Carter-Ruck, which has a reputation for SLAPP tactics against journalists, and they succeeded in getting Times Higher Education to spike their own investigatory reporting into him late last year as they prepared a story looking into his fabricating medical research subjects and plagiarising other studies.

    At the time of his death, he was being investigated by Jesus College and Cambridge University in separate proceedings, and Queens University Belfast. This time they were considering the copious evidence that Arday plagiarised from his students and lied about his achievements, rather than focusing on a complainant. Even Carter-Ruck couldn’t suppress the reporting as accusations mounted.