If we have already more than enough weapons to handle the neighbor and if we have invaded another neighbor recently https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War then why should the fourth neighbor not be worried that the weapons will be used against him?

You distort what I have said. I doubted that they cheer for the violence. That’s almost the opposite of what you are claiming.

Why have you stopped the discussion there instead of correcting me?

You have shown nothing that would show their ignorance. Cheering for Russia is a consequence from different values but that’s not automatically sheering for violence. Your quote doesn’t show that they are cheering for violent action, only for the other side. The quote calls it horror of war. That’s the opposite of sheering on violent actions.

Why? If it is not wrong how could I have a different take?

It doesn’t seem like it,

Why do you think so?

They must be compelled by, and regularly and transparently audited by, a law.

With AI that’s almost impossible. There is no explicit algorithm.

For the time being, they will support what their owners want and I doubt that that is in favor of Russia.

South Korea’s president ⁠has renewed his push to regain independent control of the military from the US

laughs in SACEUR

Don’t you think they already cooperate and stifle Russian content as much as possible? In my opinion, social media promotes as much as possible what the American elite wants.

The Polish government’s plans to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP are portrayed as a push for confrontation

That’s not unreasonable. The EU has more than enough weapons to face Russia. For how important this is, there is no chart showing our deficits. Russia knows the numbers, but the voters don’t. So why not be transparent enough to show that the budget is justified?

We lack air transport capabilities but that doesn’t matter. We are supposed to fight a defensive war at home. We can transport tanks as fast to the Baltics by train or truck as Russia and if they are faster we still can overwhelm them with fighter jets.

This leaves only one other reason for the spending on weapons in Europe: a willingness to help the US when they will isolate China.

Maybe it’s too blunt but it’s very likely that you fell for propaganda. Think about who owns the algorithms.

But electricity is still significantly more expensive than fossil gas across the EU, often charged three to five times more than gas,

That’s the efficiency factor. That much gas is needed to create the electricity.

Natural gas combustion turbine plants achieve efficiencies of 35-42%.

https://www.woodwayenergy.com/natural-gas-efficiency-in-power-generation/

… souls were free

maybe less captured.

blowing smoke up your ass about your amazing military strength for years

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khasham

Can they hide that?

How can that be enforced? Can Nato evade S400 rockets?

Non-sensical to you or non-sensical to the people in power?

Weidel is more on the US side which together with their program means that they will quit the EU to start a slim EU that is just a common market. The US influence will remain.

So at least half of humanity gets employment when they are paid to protect AI data centers from the other half.

US wants to make Europe into the same dystopia as US

Absolutely. What people don’t understand is that the US have short term economic goals but long-term political goals.

Shortsighted winning

That is only important for their managers who are essentially their employees.

But even businesses think long-term. Google has locked people deeply into their ad economy. Microsoft has given away Teams for free to now lock companies in.

As long as Europe doesn’t find a way to balance the USA with China we are going to do what the US want.

or old-school

That’s the crazy part.

Why propose it days before an exercise?

Pyongyang has previously rebuffed Lee’s offers of engagement, criticising a deal for the US to build South Korea a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines and denouncing joint drills between the two allies.

In a sign of continued sabre-rattling, North Korea fired a ballistic missile into the sea on Tuesday - the 11th suspected test so far this year - just days before a scheduled US-South Korean joint military exercise.

Doesn’t Pakistan count?

I can’t judge. I am addicted to making arrows blue.