Yes. By default we don’t want any government intervention. But the “government overreach” needs to be addressed on the specific cases where it happens.

I don’t believe any government has the right to restrict which books and news sites I should be allowed to access. I think I am the best person to decide which knowledge I should have access to.

While this statement is true sometimes, it is also again an oversimplification. I don’t think even you believe this. If a website contains illegal content, would you really prefer for the government to not intervene?

Classic examples would be the sale of hard drugs and child pictures.

We all agree more than we disagree. But communication is hard and most subjects, especially the hard ones, are not black and white.

I believe that you believe that

I can imagine the prompt to generate this:

1. Make a list of EU regulations that apply to tech giants and explain what they are.
2. For each of the regulations add one example that oversimplifies the potential downsides
3. Ommit any advantages

A troll trolling.