Everyone says muted accounts can “interact” with ones tweets but no one can inform me in what way.

How can muted accounts make so that you see what their doing?

Why does it matter if a harasser sees your tweets? How can they interact with the tweets when muted?

Muted accounts can’t @ you either.

The only difference between block and mute is that your are informing them they are blocked, prompting them to make an alt so that they can keep doing shit.

Interact how? You will never see anything they do.

Why does that matter at all?

Complain about mute? How will they know they have been muted?

Why isn’t the mute function enough?

I actually never understood why the block function existed, it clearly told the account you blocked that you have blocked them, prompting them to create an alt.

Mute is like shadowban, you won’t ever see them and they believe that you can see them.

How does mute work?

More lenient?!

I like to watch people playing Hearts of Iron 4 (a WW2 strategy game) and most of the creators avoid saying “Hitler” to avoid getting demonetized and hit with an age check.

It’s getting a lot worse.

YouTube does this sadly.

Not me but my friend always say “Engage!” when he activates his electric recliner.

There is no system permission I’m aware of that will give other applications access to Signal which is an app made to be secure with at least a PIN code for accessing it.

I lost SMS support this spring, Signal posted about this in October 2022. I’m on Android and PC.

I have a hard time seeing how this app gets my Signal info, SMS is no longer supported in Signal.

What do you mean? Similar vulnerabilities/apps/phishing has been available on iOS since at least 2020.

Do Denmark have a lot of trade with muslim countries?

Your link is about Rasmus Paludan but we (Sweden) have had several Quran burnings done by others, so has Denmark.

The last time extremists demanded something Denmark refused because they support freedom of speech.

The “offending” part just kept on publishing images of Muhammed, Denmark stood strong and did not allow extremists to dictate policy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_cartoons_controversy

Even contemplating to adapt legal limitations on what is considered to be free speech in both Denmark and Sweden is contra productive. You can’t let backward thinking extremists dictate the countries laws.

With that said, I don’t support the burnings but will tolerate them.

Not trying to be rude but do you believe that your ISP isn’t spying on you now?

Why didn’t he disengage and start breaking?