\documentclass[unholyhyphen]{donutreceipt}

Yeah, but they do it correctly.

This explanation sounds very reasonable, and it makes me feel even more disgusted.

What the actual f-

uck is up with th-

e hyphenation?

You must gather your congregation before venturing forth!

It’s colossally stupid.

Can you please tell your entire generation to get it together worldwide? That’d be great, thanks.

Leaving this here just in case: /s

Definitely better than nothing, I just think researchers should more liberally give credit where it’s due, and although things are changing, I still see lots of people treat authorship like it’s some precious commodity.

Senior professor: Your work was instrumental in getting this published, and we think your efforts should be rewarded.

The reward: 👍

It matters because, if you give in to their demands, some cats will learn that they only have to annoy you enough to get food, and they will be happy to repeat this at the earliest convenience.

This guy peer-reviews.

I can understand why they didn’t sign it.

That’s hilarious. I just love how AI is basically like a 6-year-old who weaves his favorite new expressions into everything without fully understanding what they mean.

Don’t let the door hit you on the way out!

If you’re having proportion of explained variance problems I feel bad for you son,
I got ninety nine problems but a fit ain’t one.

(⌐■_■)

I can see a Michelin star in this chef’s future.

Unless when you try to push them off of something. Then they turn massive and solid. Cats have non-newtonian properties.

deleted by creator

I think there’s still a difference between describing a concept in a way laypeople would understand and describing it using plain English. The latter is what I consider good scientific writing.

Is it really science, if it doesn’t sound like something Neil deGrasse Tyson would say to himself for 30 minutes straight in front of his bathroom mirror?