Hey look same solution here!
;-;
Hey look same solution here!
;-;
Until and unless a patch is provided to remove the need for meta I see no point in these glasses.
Good Bartenders make a place.
We Salute You.
Claws also has a neat feature of supporting the super old, and I’m talking ancinet unix days old, mailbox protocol. Which has been useful because one of the tildes I’m part of only uses the mailbox protocol and thus doens’t allow external mail protocols (no pop3 or … whatever the other is.)
But wit ha bit of hackery, it can be done. All because claws supports those super old ways of doing things.
It’s also my usenet reader. Again hackish and not ideal, but it works.
Sad that you can’t HTML with it.
Auugh man I’m sorry for glossing that over. I hate being just another ‘thunderbird exists’ guy but given the need for HTML? Yea I’m gonna chip in on that bucket.
Claws Mail client. Solid, Lightweight. Doesn’t have the polish thunderbird has, but also doens’t have a lot of the bloat either.
Looks like they didn’t pay enough protection money.
I’m amazed they made it the whole way. Still impressive.
‘Sponsored’
AKA they’re paying trump protection money.
‘opt in’
Yeeeaa i don’t believe that for one damned minute.
New to me.
Sometimes reposts are good.
Fuck that. Those cars should be banned here in america.
Not gonna lie though. The honda cub looked all kinds of fun as a buzz around bike. Nothing to prove, just 'here is a little city road burner.
90’s teenager: Corrupt government that was a maker of cheap goods and claimed to be first in everything ever and had the most bestest smartest refined cultureal history compared to us heathen backwater westerners.
THere’s reasons I struggle with looking past my own mindset whenever anything china related in the sciences pop up, as my first thought is ‘is there independant verfication there to prevent it from just being government propaganda bullshit?’
…kinda like i’m having to start doing with any ‘official’ anything here stateside now.
Oh but it CAN be measured.
It is simply that value is too short for what you need it to be.
Man here I thought I had it bad when I ended up waking up on the couch and a brand new bag of barbeque chips was gone.
sleepwalking me needs to stop pigging out.
that is a fairly blunt assessment. ‘Correction’ is not a binary after all.
After cateracts surgery I’ve got 20/80 vision in my better eye. Technically both eyes.
HOWEVER.
I have no useable depth perception. The retina on my left eye is swiss cheesed with holes and scarring from birth defects. My right retina has a major deflection in it and I ‘won’ the lottery in having it detatch post cateracts surgery (a nominally single digit percentage chance of happening) and thus needed further surgeries to correct.
Let them live in fear.
Begging your pardon Sir but it’s a bigass sky to search.
…I can actually get behind that.