Not my experience at all, after living abroad and meeting people from all over Europe. In fact, if anything, many have a overly-romanticized idea about Italy and Italians.

I don’t think yours is a statement that can be expressed generally.

I would say crespelle. But even those are made with more eggs. Usually the version similar to OP’s I make them with milk and flour + a single egg, so they are lighter.

Don’t you also have налистники? Or is that just some specific “type” of блин?

I have eaten оладьи, even though I was not aware they were called like that, and they were made with kefir/expired milk, right?

I think it’s similar in Czech, and in our (Italian) family, my mother’s side is Austrian and “palacinken” (some italianized german word) has been a family dish forever.

Why you keep posting me articles about the FTC, when the appointee in this discussion was for the department of justice, and has been confirmed a week ago (on 11th I think)?

https://www.theverge.com/news/626502/trump-doj-recommends-google-breakup-antitrust-search-chrome

This is more relevant as the topic was antitrust and breaking monopolies. This still happened before Slater was officially confirmed, and it’s something that was not started now. But at least is relevant.

…who doesn’t consider Italians properly civilized people?

Yes, but who said otherwise then?

Oh OP made it up. Nvm. They write themselves that it is a notion alternative.

None of those tools are editors, right? They all try to be a notion alternative, which is also not an editor. There is basically 0 focus on typesetting.

No, because with the above you can have rich objects in databases (for example, a dynamically updated list of medical events, each with all the attributes I want, attachments etc.), and almost arbitrarily deep nesting of databases. The idea to have databases with pages is one of the key features that made notion successful. It allows to structure knowledge without duplication, in addition to provide some other no-code features.

Spreadsheets are not even close.

I can apply critical thinking and not buy it.

Your argument is all over the place…

Any profit requires charging more than cost. Nobody is talking about infinite. In fact games after a few years end up costing pennies.

You are literally arguing nothing. Devs have the right to profit off their labor.

Basically nothing is sold to cover the cost. That’s the basic of how making a profit works. So let’s start from there. Second, when you make a digital product, you invest X and you have no idea how many copies you will sell. It’s much harder to compute the marginal cost compared to a physical item. Videogames are a luxury item, they are by no means necessary. So there is no harm in letting demand and offer regulate the price. If you feel that paying a certain amount is not worth for a game, you don’t pay it, or you wait until the price drops.

I picked up civilization VI (for my PC), hades and outer wilds for my deck.

That’s how sales of anything works. Everything is sold at the highest possible price that people are willing to pay.

I have just picked it up!

I like to make the distinction between competence and intelligence. There are some overlaps, but they are mostly distinct.

I want people with your eloquence in my life to keep me in check with my shit. <3

Saving lives isn’t a “relative concept.” I said nobody will be brought out of poverty from this, which is true.

No it’s not.

The fact that you keep denying it, doesn’t mean I need to debunk jack. You are saying “you can’t be brought out of poverty, because in a global perspective if you earn more than 3$ a day, you are not poor”, or at least, I am paraphrasing. I am saying that’s bullshit, because poverty is a relative concept and you can absolutely be poor even if you are above what is globally considered the threshold of poverty.

I am focusing on this part because it is the basis of your argument. Also:

• you have realistically no idea about the condition of the people who benefit from this
• being in debt is a situation that in itself can cause people to take their own lives, making your statement also arbitrary (no life was saved)

Calling poor people in the first world rich is again, dumb. Deal with this, no organization that focuses on poverty does it, and nobody would consider - say - a welfare check “keeping money on the top”.

I don’t know if you genuinely don’t get class divisions or if you just search for conflict online (I have seen you around…).

You are completely missing the fact that poverty is a relative concept. Using global parameters to decide that poor people in rich countries are rich is so out of touch that I cannot even describe it.

There are whole studies made on the effect of relative poverty, in case you want to expand your horizons.

Also people of that kind love nothing more than being a martyr, which means if the whole decision is not absolutely bulletproof, this has the potential to backfire so much. Not Romanian, but I was listening some opinion piece about this just few days ago.