Nah, call them what they are. Nazis. We should be treating them and Benjamin Hitleryahu like Germany during WW2.

Yep, many piracy advocates are suddenly appalled by piracy. Truth is I don’t think many of them ever actually formed a real opinion.

It’s a cancer. They are devoid of morals. A cult of sociopathy.

In case others haven’t figured it out, the US and Israel have been the terrorists this whole time. Those claiming Iran is the biggest state sponsor or terrorism are projecting.

Don’t feel alone Houthis, the US government is ran by Israel as well.

No, absolutely not. Windows still has major bugs like launching desktop apps from a shortcut drops environment variables when the environment path exceeds 2048 bytes. If AI was as good as they claim, it would have found these bugs already.

It’s almost as if Iran knew our politicians were pedophiles being bought and paid for by Israel’s blackmail operations. Every accusation by a Zionist is a confession. Since our media obviously loves this war, that means our media is protecting pedophiles.

I agree. Most actual technical professionals agree. AI has long existed in some form before tech bros in silicon valley turned it into a SaaS. It’s just the fediverse is filled with a bunch of anarchists obsessed with Loli anime, and to them chaos and a return to medieval age is their best chance of living out their child loving fantasies.

The US government is finally learning it’s capitalist system can’t compete with China in terms of AI. Someone finally got through to them capitalism will cause America to lose the AI race. Too little too late. Why they still call everyone communist and socialist, turns out they’re doing the same except it’s corporations that are allowed to be socialists and communists.

Don’t underestimate the cult. Its users parrot corporate PR scripts verbatim. “Yes we love the walled garden and developer fees. It ensures Apple is doing everything it can to keep me safe.”

KeePass honestly sucks for the most part. I love local vault and hope something better comes along, but KeePass UI constantly gives me issues. I’ve tried KeePassXC and that is what I use still, but being limited to opening a single entry at a time. Additional properties are a pain. It’s author not even understanding the need for using the desktop session for the CLI (requires passing password via the terminal to or having separate key file). KeeShare not working on Android. So many things that Bitwarden/Vaultwarden solves much better and quicker. Sad that Bitwarden/Vaultwarden didn’t make a local SQLite client that doesn’t rely on a server.

On standard flat maps, Greenland often appears around the same size as Africa. Africa is about 14 times larger than Greenland. Countries like Canada and Russia also look much larger than they actually are. I didn’t realize it for a long time either that many flat maps merely tried to flatten a 3D globe onto a 2D surface.

Now do Israel

They’re busy helping Trump’s picks win:

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/01/bernie-sanders-michigan-senate-el-sayed-01060892

And yes they had the presidency when they assisted in carrying out mass murder in Palestine. That is what they supported. ICE harming or killing a few civilians is a very small fraction of what they supported. They’re lucky they’re not signing bombs being dropped into residential neighborhoods.

Clearly you’re the one struggling with coping.here

This is why we need a new party. The Democrat brand is forever tarnished as supporting this, and a majority still does.

I remember all those Democrats who supported genocide Joe and Kamala Cheney. This is what they support. Actually, they supported militarized police sniping children and the mass murder of 20k kids. This is like a 0.001% preview of what Democrats support.

No, they’re intrinsically less secure.

GrapheneOS disagrees with you:

https://grapheneos.org/usage#web-browsing

I agree however that Chromium has some issues still. I have personally managed to crash my browser when calling the Mojo APIs via JavaScript. However, it wasn’t related to security. As GrapheneOS notes, no other browser engine provides the same levels of sandboxing. Recognizing the effectiveness of Chrome’s sandbox, Microsoft began evolving Windows kernel access control to formalize and harden these techniques at the OS level. The upcoming Windows Updates implements this in its new ProcessContainer support.

Blaming process isolation and IPC for memory bugs like Use-After-Free and dangling pointers fundamentally confuses language-level C++ problems with OS containment architecture. Memory corruption exists across all C++ engines (Gecko, WebKit, Blink); isolation is what prevents those bugs from compromising the host OS.

Handing third-party extensions blanket permissions to inspect and modify live plaintext traffic across all tabs creates a massive MITM exfiltration surface. Moving rule matching to declarativeNetRequest enforces least privilege by executing filters in the native engine without exposing sensitive network payloads to extension code.

webRequestBlocking is not deleted in MV3. The synchronous blocking engine still exists in Chromium. If an extension is installed via local policy or the Windows Registry (ExtensionInstallForcelist), full programmatic webRequestBlocking executes in Manifest V3 just as it did in MV2.

You can’t claim to be “semi-technical” while simultaneously refusing to look at technical facts and dismissing platform mechanics as “empty yapping.” How a browser engine executes extensions is inherently technical. Claiming you want facts while ignoring the architecture just means you’d rather stick with an emotional narrative than understand how the software actually works.

Chrome MV2 never supported some features people claim were lost: Features like in-flight response body rewriting and pre-socket IP filtering were Firefox-exclusive APIs (filterResponseData). Chrome MV2 never had them, so MV3 did not take them away.

webRequestBlocking is not dead in MV3. Google did not delete the synchronous blocking engine from Chromium. It requires installing via policy now. If an extension is provisioned via local policy, full programmatic webRequestBlocking runs in MV3 just as it did in MV2.

Everyday ad blocking works normally. For standard Web Store installs, uBlock Origin Lite compiles the standard filter lists (EasyList, EasyPrivacy, uBO filters) into native browser rules. Banners, trackers, and video ads are blocked.

The original claim was that “Chrome users don’t know what an ad-free web looks like.” That is provably false. If you want to understand the issue as a “semi-technical” user, you have to separate actual browser engine mechanics from internet hyperbole.

This is extremely funny that you’re trying to insult me, based on your feelings and not facts.

My only participation in this thread was that UBO Lite creator disagrees with you, which he publicly stated, but you felt… Offended? (No idea) - and decided to insult me rather than to deal with facts.

There is a word for people like you.

Troll.

Citing gorhill’s disclaimer that uBOL isn’t a 1:1 clone of uBO doesn’t prove Chrome is “ad-infested”—it conflates advanced power-user filtering with everyday ad blocking. Many limitation were Firefox-exclusive APIs that Chrome MV2 never supported in the first place.

Under the hood, standard filter lists compile directly into native C++ evaluation via declarativeNetRequest, while cosmetic element hiding and anti-adblock defusers run through the scripting and userScripts APIs. Furthermore, synchronous webRequestBlocking is still built into the Chromium engine for policy installs. Pointing out the architectural reality of how these APIs actually execute isn’t trolling; it’s addressing technical mechanics rather than hyperbole.