The difference is that you won’t find yourself unable to send an e-mail because the admin of your e-mail server doesn’t like someone from the recipient’s e-mail server.
The difference is that you won’t find yourself unable to send an e-mail because the admin of your e-mail server doesn’t like someone from the recipient’s e-mail server.
That choico is tied to your identity and can’t be easily changed later, which is what I’m complaining about.
You can choose a different moderation service. That’s the point.
But worse than anyone being able to follow that person because they’re using a platform where moderation is separate from identity, as in AtProto.
The Fediverse is, by definition, anything that supports ActivityPub. If BlueSky supported ActivityPub – which is what the bridge was meant to accomplish – then it would be a part of the Fediverse.
By using the Fediverse, you implicitly opt in to having your content federated between different platforms. How is this any different?
Seeing the reaction to the bridge, it seems that most Mastodon users don’t want AtProto to be compatible with ActivityPub.
So you didn’t get the choice at all? I guess people who sign up this way are going to be really confused why they can’t follow some accounts their friends can.
How about an advertisement poster for parking lessons, to get the point across?
If the situation is as you described, you are definitely in the right.
JavaScript is slow if you need to do things that JavaScript can’t do, such as
This is not how you demonstrate that you’re on the better side.
I personally like Purelymail. Cheap and bullshit-free.
Feel free to express what’s on your mind in any of the US politics communities on Lemmy.
How about - if you don’t like it, you can leave.
The irony in this sentence…
Many Reddit subreddits also don’t allow politics.
I have no rebottomal for this comment.
Bluesky allows me to use my domain as my identity and make my own moderation decisions without having to run my own instance.