Easy, when foreign workers take the money, it leaves the USA. When it’s an American AI company getting that money instead of an American worker, the money stays in the country.
Plus, the administration hates foreigners and loves technology. Seems consistent, at least.
There’s at least two possible outcomes when someone(s) receives aid:
Same problem with food stamps, etc. some people use it as a hand-out, some people use it as a hand-up. You can’t really help one group without helping the other, unfortunately.
I love the pattern on the right: “Despite X occurring plenty of times throughout the years on ‘my side’, this time I’m really riled up about something that’s not even true!”
He loves his country so much he wants to defend it from ignorant outsiders, but isn’t even aware of who has citizenship and won’t explain why this didn’t have any bearing on past musical performances.
Intellectual consistency isn’t their strong point.
Jellyfin.
That is all.
Technically, any image could be printed on new U.S. currency. Slow news day?
GOP plans have the follow-through ratio of a Chris Christie diet plan, so I’ll believe it when I see it.
FCC Chairman: Someone should take care of Jimmy Kimmel.
[deep state assassins terminate Kimmel]
FCC Chairman: Noooo! Not like that!!
This is a huge downside to USA protectionism of EVs. Because the USA slaps anyone who wants to import an EV, the really cheap EVs and many of the other models from overseas don’t land here. It makes Tesla seem more popular than it ought to be because they make up a huge part of the EV market in the USA. However, when you go elsewhere and the consumer can pick from the full range of EVs, they tend not to pick Tesla.
If we allowed all the foreign EVs in the USA to be sold to citizens, then Tesla would “learn” how to compete. Since they don’t have that pressure, we have an noncompetitive product. This will end just like compact cars did in the 70s. American manufacturers said “Americans don’t want small cars”. Then, everyone started importing Japanese compacts. All of a sudden GM & co. figured out how to make a compact car.
If you want your product to be a success globally, you can’t do that through tariffs and protectionism. This is not a new phenomenon.
Sorry, if you sell your project to a data collection firm you have already lost the plot anyways. These companies care only about one thing, and it’s not “making a quality app”.
Do you have an extra room in your house? How would you feel if I moved in and started smoking meth?
Has anyone checked out the fact sheet from CMS: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/wiser-fact-sheet.pdf ?
The openness of Android is the thing that kept me on the platform. Now that the openness is being removed, iOS is now more appealing.
Sadly, I think most of the customers that use Android never sideload a single app at all. I don’t expect this to create a mass exodus, but a smaller one with power users.
This will only be effective so long because gradually apps will require greater and greater API levels. Staying stuck in the past is, at best, a temporary solution.
There are two types of gamers:
Some see an open world sandbox and say “Wow, I can do anything!” and pick their own goals.
The other type says “WHAT it’s pointless!” and wants some kind of arrow pointing at the next objective.
Did you just mansplain mansplaining!?
When will men learn to stop trying to share information?!
YOU might think they are well defined terms, but there are people claiming with a straight face that “race X can’t be racist, because racism needs power structures” or all this other exceptionalism. They use every definition but the one in the dictionary.
“white men can’t experience racism and sexism”
A big problem here is that not everyone has a common definition for racism and sexism. Some definitions take existing power structures and historical context, and others don’t. A discussion about this topic should be started with what specifically each participant believes these terms mean. Otherwise you have two people talking about “sexism” but they are just talking past each other because they lack a shared understanding of the term as it is used.
If you were to say “black people are bad” then the rebuttal typically becomes “due to established power structures, white men can’t be oppressed, therefore I can say what I want about them”.
I think it’s hard to have a reasoned discussion where you say “all men do X” because for every X, there’s probably a bunch of exceptions. There is a great amount of variance in male behavior.
It’s original sin, just by gender. I think people underestimate the harm in painting all men with the same brush. Once the conversation morphs from “I hate this thing some males do” and changes into “I HATE MEN” you can’t have a productive conversation.
If those other sources make more money and get more viewers, why did it start on YouTube?
“It’s worth the cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths […] so that we can have the Second Amendment” - Charlie Kirk, 2023