

By weight it’s almost fifty-fifty (28:32).


By weight it’s almost fifty-fifty (28:32).


Wait until the next judge orders to have the prisons run the air conditioning at resonable temperatures by 2039…
I dearly hope my cynic comment ages like milk.
12 isn’t exactly teen, is it? ;) Must I have lived through it to know about it? :P


The local web, duh!
FAT12 and FAT16 were a thing as well.


That’s still worse than abandoning flying by and large.
While on the surface being CO₂ neutral, SAF contributes to climate change, because the airliner emissions are in a part of the atmosphere (several km above ground) where the CO₂ has a bigger effect on climate than the CO₂ would have where it was captured (~ground level).
That is if I remember correctly what I read about it some time ago and given the source was reliable. It made sense to me when I read it…
edit:
I don’t intend to let “perfect be the enemy of good”.
It’s more like we got used to a lot of things and sometimes don’t question them radically enough.
A bit of greenwashing here and there just isn’t good enough, if we want to save what’s left of the climate we knew.

Still quite expensive.

$3 per bee
More like $1 per 3 bees.


Can’t you think of the poor, poor shareholders whose value must be protected?!
I bet you’re a socialist!
What’s next…
…free healthcare?
Affordable housing?
Affordable groceries?
Livable wages for all even if not unionized?
Free, good education?
An upper limit on how much money (=power) one can amass?
…I better stop before it gets even more sad.


Why would you want to put the onus of proving something illegal was done on the victims?
Banning pervert glasses solves the problem at the root. Plus it’s orders of magnitude more easy to prove someone wore them than proving something illegal was done with them.
MPAA - make perverts afraid again ;)


That it’s only one city that bans pervert glasses?


That just means no extra money during these times.
You don’t need to try timing the market.
You operate with thresholds instead: the $150k have become $150k + x -> move x to stable assets and wait until the next time there’s x extra.
What’s not working is trying to have a reliable, stable source of extra incoming.
Skimming gains is possible though.


You can withdraw/shift allocation to more stable assets during bullruns and live off these stable assets until the rest of your more volatile assets have made gains again.


Would you rather have them let him die?
Their body, their choice.
Is that really so hard to understand?
In that case the fee would be around three-fiddy and not $85 or almost 50%.
Just have a look at the most recent slap on Meta’s wrist for knowingly ruining countless lives of children and teenagers.


Be careful not to crack the windshield while walking over it, because that’d be a real bummer for the car brain.
More importantly: don’t get caught ;)


Most terminals these days use the card’s NFC function, which can’t be ruined by some measly magnet.
It should be safe.


Important to note that it’s typically violence against people who can’t really push back without risking getting killed.
It’s time to make bullies afraid again, but I don’t know how without starting a total escalation.
Nope.
From https://gadgetbridge.org/basics/features/navigation/#supported-devices
Supported devices
Navigation instructions are currently supported by the following devices:
I wasn’t sure that silicon still has only 1 neutron per proton, so I had to check as well.
Looking again at the periodic table it seems like some elements before and after silicon already have an extra neutron per proton (even the majority of lithium has an extra neutron!) - gotta keep the nucleus together, right?