minimar@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoBusinesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square354fedilinkarrow-up12.74Karrow-down1166
arrow-up12.57Karrow-down1imageBusinesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then...lemmy.worldminimar@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square354fedilink
minus-squarevortic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down3·1 year agoMoney is speech, right? Does that make the ramifications of this decision go a lot farther? I don’t see how yet, but it seems like this ruling may have broad impacts when people start getting creative with it…
minus-squaremeteotsunami@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down4·1 year agoBold assuming the corrupted six ever used anything close to consistency to inform their rulings.
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down2·1 year agoI mean, there’s one thing that’s pretty consistent: they’ll do whatever their wealthy backers want them to do.
minus-square🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year ago money is speech, right? I mean, they do say that “money talks” and last time I checked, talking is a form of speech.
Money is speech, right? Does that make the ramifications of this decision go a lot farther? I don’t see how yet, but it seems like this ruling may have broad impacts when people start getting creative with it…
Bold assuming the corrupted six ever used anything close to consistency to inform their rulings.
I mean, there’s one thing that’s pretty consistent: they’ll do whatever their wealthy backers want them to do.
I mean, they do say that “money talks” and last time I checked, talking is a form of speech.