Got it. I just asked about the evidence that convinced you, I’m not even sure how you could make the leap to
Are you saying UN is wrong?
or even what being wrong in this case means.
A lot of people believe IDF claims without a shred of evidence and that’s a disservice to the truth, like the 40 beheaded babies thing. The total child casualty count for Oct 7 was 36, including Israeli forces killing at least 2 Israeli children in one encounter.
But it’s confirmed by UN themselves and action are taken on 9 of the 12 individual, with 1 being dead.
Where did you read that?
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/r1zhhvmca
How did you get to that conclusion? The only “evidence” from the article seems to be
Was pictures from the IDF the evidence that convinced you?
My opinion is based on the article where UN took action on 9 of the 12 individual after their preliminary investigation. Are you saying UN is wrong?
Got it. I just asked about the evidence that convinced you, I’m not even sure how you could make the leap to
or even what being wrong in this case means.
A lot of people believe IDF claims without a shred of evidence and that’s a disservice to the truth, like the 40 beheaded babies thing. The total child casualty count for Oct 7 was 36, including Israeli forces killing at least 2 Israeli children in one encounter.
Wait now I get it, you were being defensive.
No i don’t get it lol. You asked i answered and you get oddly upset about my opinion, now i’m being called defensive.
This person was just thing to answer your question. I think you read too much into it philosophically /: