• Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Besides that it gets built with labor and not capital … lots of things people build for all to use, some even pool together to build libraries, schools, etc.

    But the short answer why would you build a garden/factory/connect hall/etc is so that afterwards you live in a world/society that now has a place to take a walk, toys, concerts, etc.

    You would only like to own those things just because it gets you into the position to exploit others (the main topic here I mean) that were unable to build it. Exploit them to have a more comfortable life in unrelated things.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        We pay government for that.

        Unless you mean like poets etc - that’s the beauty of it, this would allow that.

    • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      But why would I, as an individual, spend my life learning how to build buildings and then build them if I have no more benefit from doing that than I would from someone else putting in all that work? Surely I’d just do nothing and wait for someone else to do it?

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What else would you do? You get all your needs met.

        And when no money as such having a big role, you get recognized by what you do and accomplish, not by what made the most profit (that is a huge distinction imho).

        • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Recognition isn’t as important as you make it sound. And most people will hardly start to work out of boredom. There’s plenty of ways to spend your time that are not productive.

          In addition, there are plenty of jobs literally nobody wants to do, and consequently, nobody would do under your proposed system.

          • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            With absence of money as the main ‘power’ it’s your deeds that are the only thing left to define the extra exclusive things like apartments, experiences, etc.

            And that is the thing, afaik all studies & experiments concluded that people start being productive regardless. It’s not “out of boredom”. Its just something to do. Sure, not everything benefits everyone, but imagine the impact of all the eg artist stuck flipping burgers. They would seem ‘unproductive’ just “laying about” until they produce a pice the whole world recognizes as something special (and not just because of the marketing budget).

            Basically no one just stays still doing nothing, definitely not a significant margin. Same with animals, at the very least they will play.

            Eg, could you imagine your life without long-term producing/making/planning something?

                  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Don’t they? Imagine people thinking a bit more, having free time, etc - the effects on politics, local quality of living, and so on.

                    I would much rather live in a neighborhood of people reading books all day vs working in a factory all day.