• erin@lemmy.sidh.bzh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t china the one asking japan and south korea to come closer to china geopolitic veil? Seems that’s not the best move to convince them…

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A country putting wellbeing of their own people over geopolitic games seems like the right move to me. I would certainly not want to be eating food from a place where people shit where they eat.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, protecting the public from food sourced in water contaminated by nuclear waste is actually China playing 4D geopolitical chess. There’s an easy way for Japan to avoid the whole issue here by not dumping nuclear waste into the ocean, but I guess they’ll just be able to sell it to people living in western countries whose governments don’t give a shit about them.

          • u_tamtam@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you live in China? Perhaps you miss some first-hand exposure of the political dynamics of the two countries.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t live in China, but I’m perfectly aware of the political dynamics between Japan and China. None of that changes the fact that Japan discharging nuclear waste into the ocean is a legitimate reason for avoiding seafood from Japan. It’s honestly kind of impressive the amount of effort you’re spending here trying to paint this as something other than that.

              • u_tamtam@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I asked earlier a restaurant/pub table neighbour if he knew about not getting seafood from Japan, he was only surprised that it wasn’t banned already. Except maybe for some body care products, you don’t ever see anything being advertised as coming from Japan or being culturally associated with Japan, that draws customers anger. Propaganda running new reasons to hate on Japan is business as usual.

                None of that changes the fact that Japan discharging nuclear waste into the ocean is a legitimate reason for avoiding seafood from Japan.

                Absolutely, as soon China can bring evidence that safe levels of radiation as assessed by an independent international organization represent a safety risk to their people. For some, oh, color me surprised, unbelievable reason they didn’t.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, imagine erring on the side of caution. Again, impressive amounts of work you’re putting into spinning this as a nefarious plot of some sort.

                  • u_tamtam@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    yep, erring on the side of caution regarding nuclear safety levels, that sounds totally like China, as we saw no later than two years ago at Taishan. Sure.