Rishi Sunak’s Conservatives on Friday suffered two crushing UK parliamentary by-election defeats but averted a “3-0” drubbing by unexpectedly holding on to Boris Johnson’s old Uxbridge seat.

The grave problems facing the British prime minister were highlighted when the opposition Labour party secured its biggest-ever by-election win in the once-safe Tory seat of Selby and Ainsty in Yorkshire.

Earlier the centrist Liberal Democrats demolished a massive Tory majority to win the seat of Somerton and Frome, opening up a dangerous new front for Sunak in the Tory heartlands of England’s South West.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not just the Tory candidate, but the Labour candidate, the Labour leader, the Labour deputy leader, every journalist, and also every pollster and focus group. That’s enough evidence for me. It certainly beats out your theory which you have, frankly, just imagined.

    The current Lib Dem leader was actually a Cabinet member in a Tory-led government, so I’m not sure who you’re calling Tory lite, tbh. I’m going to vote for the party that always makes the country better whenever they get into government and I think you should, too, rather than getting distracted by media management.

    • G4Z@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pollster and focus group? I’ve not seen any such evidence.

      It seems my guess is as good as any bodies really, and I can certainly imagine there are others who are revolted by the way Labour has been going on.

      Fair point about Davey, and in fairness I’ve no idea what they are even about now they are so irrelevant.

      I’m going to vote for the party that always makes the country better

      I’d like to believe Labour will do that, I just don’t.

      • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, to pick two from opposite sides of the aisle, Luke Tryl has said Ulez was the big issue and so has James Johnson. Your ‘guess’ is as good as anybody’s; however, your guess is not as good as actual evidence.

        I’m going to take Labour’s 100% track record at making the country better over any amount of pessimism. If they implement even a single policy that they’ve promised, that will be an improvement on the current situation!

        • G4Z@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Labour’s 100% track record at making the country better over

          Sorry but, I actually remember the Labour years and this is massively over simplifying.

          They actually encouraged and made worse a lot of problems we are dealing with now, things like housing and starting an illegal war.

          That aside, we are talking about a different labour to the one from 15+ years ago and the things Keir is saying are not very encouraging and I don’t support a party, I vote for policy so that’s why I take a dim view of what I’m hearing.

          Might they be marginally better, maybe, I used to believe that but I’m sorry he’s lost me. I know you and Kier will say that the proof is in the polling, and that might be true but I think with how god-awful this last decade has been it should be even better than that.

          I am sick to fuck of pandering to old boomer fucks in marginal constituencies. You probably got that tho right?

          • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t say Labour was perfect, I said they made things better. And they did. For example, they didn’t spend enough on building new housing, it’s true, but they did massively improve the remaining council housing stock. You can’t expect them to fix everything and it’s quite safe to blame the Tories for the continued failure: they paused or scrapped a lot of new council building belatedly started by Labour, for example.

            Labour’s current pledge to reform planning rules to allow more housebuilding (and actually more building generally, including onshore wind) will go some way to fixing that problem. If those reforms are effective, they’ll lead to greater economic growth and Labour will then be able to spend and invest more in other areas. That’s the plan.

            None of that will happen if they don’t get elected. That’s the bit you’re calling ‘pandering’ and I’m calling ‘media management’. Allowing yourself to get distracted by the marketing, which I’m afraid is what you’re doing, instead of the substance, is a mistake.

            • G4Z@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can’t expect them to fix everything

              I don’t but I do expect them to grapple the big issues, like our broken electoral system (and the media and it’s ownership for that matter) and climate change, I’d like them to actually redistribute all the wealth in this country i.e take it off the billionaires and aristocrats and companies that are hoarding wealth.

              Labour’s current pledge to reform planning rules to allow more housebuilding (and actually more building generally, including onshore wind) will go some way to fixing that problem.

              It won’t, it is faffing about at the edges, we need to stop anybody who isn’t resident here owning property and we need taxes on multiple ownership as well as a mass social house building program.

              None of that will happen if they don’t get elected. That’s the bit you’re calling ‘pandering’ and I’m calling ‘media management’. Allowing yourself to get distracted by the marketing, which I’m afraid is what you’re doing, instead of the substance, is a mistake.

              I know, and I personally think is cowardly as fuck.

              Make your case and bring people with you is the way to actually gain support, all he is doing is playing the same old FPTP game. With no intention of reforming it.

              I know I know perfect enemy of good and whatever, but I think he’s shite, I’m very disappointed.

              • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                None of what you’re saying makes the slightest sense. You’re advocating for a bunch of policies proposed by no parties and with no popular support and then saying you’re going to vote Lib Dem? It’s totally incoherent. You started out complaining about Tory voters voting Tory. How will you persuade those Tory voters to vote for your dystopian daydream?

                The party that comes closest to what you say you want is Labour. The cowardly thing for them to do would be to pretend that everything’s just great, that we can all just cross our fingers and wish the Tories away. They’re actually out there trying to win the votes they need to make things better.

                • G4Z@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  How doesn’t it make sense, those are policies I would like to see, that a lot of voters would like to see actually.

                  You’re advocating for a bunch of policies proposed by no parties

                  Yeah no shit mate, that’s exactly the problem.

                  vote Lib Dem?

                  So what? I’ve voted LD in the past because they have had more progressive policy and they support PR voting reform unlike Labour they actually implement as policy objectives the things their members vote for, unlike Keir who just ignores his party on issues like PR. Yeah Daveys not inspiring, but neither is Keith.

                  The party that comes closest to what you say you want is Labour.

                  No it isn’t, I just laid out for you the kind of policy I want and Labour are a million miles away in Tory land.

                  The cowardly thing for them to do would be to pretend that everything’s just great, that we can all just cross our fingers and wish the Tories away.

                  Isn’t that exactly what he’s doing? Crossing his fingers and having power handed to him by default because the Tories are hated and the voting system is shit? That’s what it seems like to me.

                  They’re actually out there trying to win the votes they need to make things better.

                  They are trying to won votes, but HOW are they going to make things better? Are they going to do anything about those major issues I mentioned?

                  Because all I’ve heard from fucking Keith is Tory talking points about growth and tough on crime and it makes me want to fucking vomit.

                  You know if he said he was going to be tough on Tory criminals and criminal wealth hoarders like the Royal family… I could get on board with that, but we all know what that shit is about it’ll be ‘anti social behaviour’ and cracking down on poor people smoking weed and shit.

                  Edit :

                  Also, I know this is youtube comments but I just came across this, just take a look at the comments under Starmers interview here it’s remarkable how similar in general they are to what I am saying and there’s LOADS of them.

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcPqLVUQn4c

                  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    As I have already explained, Labour’s plan is to raise taxes on the rich (through abolishing non-dom status and VAT exemption for private schools) and to invest that money in building green infrastructure and housing, while reforming planning to make that happen. Starmer says this stuff all the time but you’ve instead opted to get your news from YouTube comments.

                    As for the Lib Dems, doing what their members ask, I have two words: tuiton fees.