• nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Its designed to be used for pen testers so they don’t have to spend $20,000 on the alternative cable. Its a single cable thats costs like $200, so im not really worried many people are going to get hacked because they accidentally bought a $200 cable.

    • Arbiter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      The bigger concern is a supply chain attack, where an actor targets a specific buyer or agency with these cables.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        22 days ago

        Yeah that makes sense, im no expert but whats that saying ‘physical access is root access’ or something along those lines. Id imagine this is true (in spirit at least) about the cables.

      • Delta_V@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        The capability itself is concerning. This bespoke cable might cost $200, but what would the unit cost be if a state decided to mass produce them?

        • Arbiter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 days ago

          Even at 200 per unit a state actor could certainly see it as worth the cost for a specific attack.