• JLock17@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Digital is fine for things that don’t need to be touched. Arguably, it’s better.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Separate analog odometers are better, because it’s a single point of failure otherwise. If one breaks, I can still read all other instruments (fuel, engine temp, speed and/or rpm, whichever failed)

      • noobdoomguy8658@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        This.

        You work in software just a couple of years, you learn to appreciate the mechanical solutions on a whole other level. Especially in cars.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        I think the whole cluster can also fail all at once as well as the individual components, so it’s actually more points of failure.