• JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    So a shit take is a public harassment?

    In the context of the comment you were responding to? Yes!

    Count your downvotes dude. Who is arguing in bad faith? I think you should take a second and go back and read the thread from the beginning from the mindset of someone who doesn’t know what’s going on in your head.

    In case it isn’t clear, it sounds like you’re belittling harassment to what you want to call a “shit take”, and that you think that harassment is basically the fault of the harrassee for doing whatever they do in “public”. Maybe that isn’t what you meant, but to the rest of us, that’s what you said.

      • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m sorry is this argument hinging on our disagreeing about the term “shit take”?

        You tell me. I’ve explained what it sounds like you’re saying to the rest of us.

          • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Whatever. You asked why I went off on what you said and I’m explaining why. You keep questioning that. If you don’t get it, you’re obviously obtuse. I’m not the only one who thought what you said was bad. It actually doesn’t matter what you said afterwards. What you said was normalizing harassment of people who put there work out in public, and you won’t admit it. You just keep saying the same thing over that that isn’t what you said. I was the second person to tell you what you said was bad. Many people downvoted you. If you want another opinion, give an LLM the original comment and your response, and ask it how your response could be interpreted. It will probably tell you that you were normalizing harassment.