• Termight@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Here are two reasons you might not want to use Signal: Your contacts, your settings, your entire Signal experience is tied to a Signal account managed by Signal. Metadata—who you’re talking to, when, and how often—can still be collected and analyzed. Question everything.

    • Special Wall@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      The issue of centralization can be a problem, but in regards to metadata, sealed sender does a lot to prevent Signal’s servers from knowing who messages who, which makes Signal a lot more private than described here.

      • Termight@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        So use no messenger? Any decentralized options?

        Alternatives to Signal that prioritize decentralized communication.

        • Briar Project (https://briarproject.org/ ): A compelling choice for censorship resistance. Briar employs peer-to-peer messaging, connecting via Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or Tor, and incorporates privacy features by design. It’s a robust solution for those concerned about surveillance.
        • Delta Chat (https://delta.chat/ ): A decentralized and secure messenger application. It’s often praised for its ease of use and integration with existing email accounts.
        • XMPP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMPP ): Less of an application and more of a foundational protocol. XMPP is an open standard for instant messaging, allowing for decentralized implementations – though setting up and maintaining such a system requires a degree of technical expertise.
      • sqgl@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        SimpleX is decentralized, requires no phone number, based on Signal code. Screws up invitations via FB/Messenger though.