Context: Aside from Marathon missing the mark on its early playtests and getting mediocre reviews, Bungie was caught copy/pasting stolen art into a lot of the game’s art and textures. The company is internally under fire.

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 days ago

    Live service garbage has costed the industry billions in losses and costed tens of thousands of devs their jobs. Fad chasing in general.

    Everyone wants to make the fortnite killer or overwatch killer. They set billions of dollars on fire and get nothing for it. And it’s the devs who pay the price. Not the c-suite dipshits who threw all that money in the fire pit.

    • rigatti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 days ago

      I mean, the money does go somewhere. People get paid while the game is being developed. It’s just that the investors don’t get the ROI.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      I mean they also created a ton of jobs and it‘s not like devs working on single player games don‘t face layoffs and bonuses fraud. Besides Overwatch 2 killed Overwatch already.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Way to make a truly bad faith argument or perhaps you are lost or something. To clarify: Are you implying it‘s any different for AAA SP games? Because that’s the discussion here.

          • SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ahh sorry, I didn’t see the comment earlier.

            Yes, imo live service games are very bad for the people who buy them and the people making it.

            They are only there to make cash. And they make this cash through terrible predatory monetization - loot boxes, microtransactions, season passes. These companies actually want to run casinos that target the most vulnerable and children. You can argue that people wouldn’t want to work on this if they had a choice.

            There’s almost always very little artistic value.

            At least with sp AAA, you can gain a cult following if you have an interesting gameplay, or story. what are you doing with a live service one? Nothing, just offering the same thing that someone else has already created in another flavour, just to chase a trend. What this means is that they’re more likely to fail and not for the fault of the devs for sure.

            They’re also bad for preservation of games. All live service games die, you can’t play them once support ends. You paid 60 dollars to rent a game? (Though I suppose that’s true with sp always online games as well and it’s not directly a bad thing for the dev)

            Though… you maybe sort of right, the Industry is so bad right now that it doesn’t even matter whether you are working on sp or live service, you are in some sort of hell regardless…

            • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              I‘m just going to say that the distinctions between the two you‘re laying out here seem irrelevant to the discussion to me. I am not arguing about a season pass or preservation of games. Again, that is not what this discussion is about. This is about the developing side of games where these things don‘t mean anything. To give an example of what I mean: World of Warcraft employed and paid more people over a longer period of time than most AAA games.

              • SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 hours ago

                I don’t know of the statistics, so yes, I can’t say for sure sp employs more people than live service. But in my opinion live service games are more risky and harmful to the industry as a hole.

                But my original comment was about how it doesn’t matter if they created jobs or not because they are trying to replace everyone with AI. Coders, designers, artists… So it doesn’t matter sp or live service. They want to not employ anyone and run casinos

                • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Sorry but if you think AAA studios aren‘t doing the exact same then I‘ve got a bridge to sell to you.

                  • SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    14 hours ago

                    No I assume they’re all AAA - sp and live service.

                    And I don’t have any delusions about them not doing this for sp as well. Hence the comment about how shitty the industry is in general.

                    I just think games that call themselves live service aren’t games. (Not multiplayer games that also happen to be live service)

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Please phrase your thoughts in a way everyone can understand and if possible a little less mockingly? What is it that you have a problem with exactly?