Someone posted in r/waymo a video of someone covering all the cameras with tape, which apparently immobilizes the self driving car. I interpreted that as non dangerous to actual people since it keep the car from moving at all.

Anyway, everyone in the comments was a circle jerk saying Waymo should come after the person legally. I suggested that big tech like Google and Uber may do more unethical things than this person putting some tape on a self driving car. Never did I once threaten violence lol.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    It kind of is though?

    Essentially no protections for operators from bots, which means no protection for communities from automated infiltration and astroturfing.

    The only thing stopping it is that the cost/benefit isn’t there yet with how small Lemmy is. But that’s slowly changing.

    • Mose13@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There are captchas but I suppose you could work around that easily by having a human sign up and offloading the account to a bot. If it really became a problem I’m sure Lemmy could adapt, but it could involve similar fingerprinting techniques to Reddit. Lemmy being petty privacy conscious would likely hate that. But I say we solve one problem at a time. Bots aren’t an issue yet.

      • isekaihero@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        God no. Bots are already better at solving Captchas than humans are. The only use case for captchas is to do what 4chan did and make every post require a captcha and then charge a fee to bypass them.