• SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the argument might be that we’re a relatively small nation. Anywhere he needs to get to, or would likely need to get to could be accessed by road, or train.

    • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think within reason yes. But if you can fit a meeting in Scotland plus a meeting on London in on the same day by air then why wouldn’t you? Personally I want my PM to be working hard day and night not sitting in cars.

      Of course if we had decent fast trains up and down and side to side for the country then it would be different. But we’ll never have those 🤗.

      • mondoman712@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        On Tuesday, Sunak used a helicopter for an engagement in Norwich, a trip of little more than 100 miles. In May, he flew to and from Southampton to visit a pharmacy for an NHS-related announcement, a 160-mile round trip where the train takes an hour and 15 minutes each way.

        We have decently fast trains to a lot of places, and he is taking the helicopter for journeys that wouldn’t be that long on the train. Plus you can actually do some work while riding the train, which is difficult in a car and pretty impossible in a helicopter.

        • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a fair point. If he can take a fast train then cool. I’m not arguing for complete helicopter travel everywhere. Just that where it makes sense he should. Obviously where it doesn’t he shouldn’t. I don’t think that’s controversial.

      • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s this amazing thing called Teams we’ve all learned to use over the last few years that means you don’t have to be at a meeting physically anymore.

          • SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No one is advocating for him to travel by train and road across the world, just when it’s reasonable to do so domestically.

            And if it’s not worth the hassle it takes to get there, maybe it could be fine over the internet instead.

            • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe I misjudged the tone but it seems people are happy to travel large distances by plane helicopter only when those large distances are abroad. Why not when they are domestic too?

              I take your point about over the internet meetings but in the world of politics where human interaction is key i think it is worth the hassle to travel. That being said… maybe I’ll wake up in a world where G20 is done over Zoom. What a world…

          • charlytune@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “And can we have the view of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom please… Oh!”

            “Erm, I am the Prime Minister, I’m not a cat”