jackeroni@lemmy.mlBanned from community to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 个月前"We're totally different sides!"lemmy.mlimagemessage-square482linkfedilinkarrow-up1748arrow-down1269
arrow-up1479arrow-down1image"We're totally different sides!"lemmy.mljackeroni@lemmy.mlBanned from community to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 个月前message-square482linkfedilink
minus-squareSinAdjetivos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·11 个月前How did you quantity that 10x times? My best naïve estimate puts Democrats at 1.44-1.98x as corrupt.
minus-squaremisteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.comdeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down8·edit-27 个月前deleted by creator
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·11 个月前Answer the question, genocide denier. How did you quantify 10x times? Or 1000x? That’s the exact opposite of the Democrat’s political ideology. No, it’s exactly Democrat political ideology.
minus-squaremisteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.comdeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-27 个月前Removed by mod
minus-squareSinAdjetivos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 个月前 where did you get 1.98? Public database of rich people spending money on disinformation tactics: https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-overview That’s the exact opposite of the Democrat’s political ideology. Where do you get that idea?
How did you quantity that 10x times?
My best naïve estimate puts Democrats at 1.44-1.98x as corrupt.
deleted by creator
Answer the question, genocide denier. How did you quantify 10x times? Or 1000x?
No, it’s exactly Democrat political ideology.
Removed by mod
Public database of rich people spending money on disinformation tactics: https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-overview
Where do you get that idea?