Not that it’s bad. For me, it’s actually very useful, I just find it mildly amusing that an app for managing AppImages is packaged as a Flatpak, despite the two formats being widely known as competitors*.

* Okay, most people (including me) would say that the two formats are for different use cases and aren’t directly competitors, but for the eyes of a lot of AppImage purists and Flatpak critics, they are.

  • BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    What’s off? It’s an app for managing appimages that is hosted on flathub. Just because it is a flatpak does not mean it can’t manage appimages

    edit: a word

    • Kata1yst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      At the same time, it’s like a Ford executive driving a Chevy. It looks wrong.

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        More like a train conductor driving a car between their home and work.