You seem to be using this argument like it’s some kind of zinger, rather than a remarkable demonstration of your lack of understanding of the situation.
This is what got them proscribed as a terrorist group
They each face a charge of conspiracy to destroy property and conspiracy to enter a prohibited place for a purpose prejudicial to the safety and/or interests of the UK.
So are you saying you believe they have been charged?
Also important to note the person this thread is about is not in the article you linked, so can you clarify whether you believe Heba is related to the article you linked?
Are you saying the law on remand is an opinion?
Can’t do the time, don’t do the crime
You seem to be using this argument like it’s some kind of zinger, rather than a remarkable demonstration of your lack of understanding of the situation.
Win stupid prizes
They haven’t been charged.
What crime have they been >charged< for?
This is what got them proscribed as a terrorist group
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c98nn62djpdo
So are you saying you believe they have been charged?
Also important to note the person this thread is about is not in the article you linked, so can you clarify whether you believe Heba is related to the article you linked?
Yes, that’s how it works. You get charged, then either held on remand or bailed before your trial.
And when 182 days of remand passes what happens?
Nothing. There is no time limit
Ah so the rule of law doesn’t apply and we live in an authoritarian state.