Suprized?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you upload something and don’t pay, then the reason they’re hosting it for you is access to your data

  • shadycomposer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t it obvious? I bet every other AI companies do the same. Honestly I think personalized models, for ads, tracking or whatever other purposes, are much worse than this but people have been happily living with it for a long time.

    If you don’t want your data to be used, don’t put it on internet.

  • bioemerl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    To all of you people trying to fight for image copyright lawsuits against stability AI - this is what you’re fighting for. AI out of your control and in the hands of people like meta instead of your own

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Posts that were fed to the new AI include both text and photos, Nick Clegg, Meta’s president of global affairs, told Reuters in a Thursday interview.

    Meta has some measures to exclude private details from public datasets used by the AI, Clegg told Reuters.

    Emu was trained using photos from Instagram and Facebook posts, while Llama 2 used other public data sets, a Meta spokesperson told Insider in a statement.

    Clegg added that he expects some people to legally contest whether training AI with copyrighted content is fair use, per Reuters.

    Authors, artists, and developers have been suing AI companies and firms like Meta over concerns that their work is being used without their consent to train a technology that could undermine their careers.

    Facebook and Instagram users own the content that they post as long as it doesn’t infringe on someone else’s intellectual property rights, per Meta’s policies.


    The original article contains 356 words, the summary contains 149 words. Saved 58%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!