I’m kind of sick of being a dev. I hate AI with a passion.

I hate the hallucinations, I hate slop, I hate megacrops, I hate the environmental impacts, I hate the massive costs. I could go on but you get the picture.

At work I often times have to review vibe code slop from people who clock in 9 to 5 and don’t give a fuck (I respect that, I just wish your fucking code wasn’t slop)

I’m sick of it, I’m sick of hearing about AI tooling or new models or bro agentic actions bro based on your documentation bro.

I want to switch careers, so which career is not ruined by AI?

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re joking me right? I’m pretty sure this is actively happening. they’re going to put the kids in individual tubes with iPads and a toilet

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s so bad for a child’s development. A computer can’t guide a kid’s hand to practice fine motor skills. It can’t impart social skills to help kids interact with each other. It can’t help kids revolve conflicts with each other, or handle behaviors that require a human touch. Imagine a couple kids fighting because they can’t share - what’s a computer gonna do? A kid can just ignore its instructions. What’s to stop a kid from physically attacking a robo-nanny or whatever fresh hell gets developed in this field?

        I work with kids with difficult behaviors. There are ethical boundaries we need to be aware of. Will a robo-nanny be imparted with those rules? How accountable would it be if it did something ethically questionable? What will it be trained on - actual knowledge of children’s psychology (in which case, using a robot at all should be discounted right off, as children thrive on human interaction)? Or will it be trained on what parents/teachers have already been doing, which would inevitably result in being trained on outdated techniques that don’t follow updates in science? If a robot thinks spanking, isolation, or withholding food is okay, that’d be extremely troubling. There’s so much that could go wrong, and knowing this tech isn’t being designed with ethics in mind makes this whole endeavor terrifying.

        Are parents going to be comfortable with their kids being alone in a room without an adult? A group of kids could simply band together to lock the robot in a closet or something and let chaos reign. They could figure out how to power it down, or throw things at it until it stops functioning. A kid having a tantrum can be a powerful force, potentially injuring other children in the act, and I highly doubt a robot alone could handle that situation effectively. Where I work it can take a team of adults with blocking pads, and coordination with even more adults to clear other students from the area. Sometimes those other kids are playing games and don’t want to leave, and it takes a trusted adult to convince them that yeah, no, we need to move now. Which brings us to the relationship the teachers have with the students, and how it is crucial to gaining what’s called “instructional control,” which basically means, “this kid will listen to your instructions.” Can a robot foster that? Do we want a robot to be able to foster that? I don’t like the idea of kids personifying machines to that extent, and we’re quickly learning how damaging (literally, it can cause brain damage) that can be for young minds.

        I could go on and on, but suffice to say this whole topic is an ethical clusterfuck.

      • ChristerMLB@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not my experience, at least not here in Norway – in fact, there’s been a pretty big backlash against the digitalization of childhood in schools and kindergartens, so I’d be very surprised if there’s any increasing pressure on us to use computers at all with the children. A colleague of mine put on some movies a handful of times in December, and even that caused some concerned messages from parents.

        • Sequence5666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Unfortunately the countries with high population and public education being negligible, have really low pay.

          I heard Norway and Sweden kindergarten teachers get 120,000 USD ! that sounds great.

          • ChristerMLB@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            hehe, I wish, but no, the starting salary is more like $55 000, increasing to about $65 000 as you get more experience.

            • Sequence5666@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              oh no. That does sound low. But i do believe if your interest lies in teaching it brings you joy.

              Can someone in their late twenties start teaching in nordic schools? Or do they have to begin studying for 2+ diploma courses?