Hello World!

We’ve made some changes today, and we’d like to announce that our Code of Conduct is no longer in effect. We now have a new Terms of Service, in effect starting from today(October 19, 2023).

The “LAST REVISION DATE:” on the page also signifies when the page was last edited, and it is updated automatically. Details of specific edits may be viewed by following the “Page History” reference at the bottom of the page. All significant edits will also be announced to our users.

The new Terms of Service can be found at https://legal.lemmy.world/


In this post our community mods and users may express their questions, concerns, requests and issues regarding the Terms of Service, and content moderation in Lemmy.World. We hope to discuss and inform constructively and in good faith.

  • AvaddonLFC ☄️ 🤘@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Every one of our users has a right to browse and interact with the website and all of its contents free of treatment such as harassment, bullying, violation of privacy or threats of violence.

    Why would we need to spell out every form of these acts? Curious.

    • fiat_lux@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      For what I expect are similar reasons the list of forbidden image and text content gets so detailed:

      5.0.6: No visual content depicting executions, murder, suicide, dismemberment, visible innards, excessive gore, or charred bodies. No content depicting, promoting or enabling animal abuse. No erotic or otherwise suggestive media or text content featuring depictions of rape, sexual assault, or non-consensual violence. All other violent content requires a NSFW tag.

      I now know from this list that posting Hieronymus Bosch’s “The Garden of Earthly Delights” would be problematic even though it wouldn’t occur to me that medieval illustrations of fictional torture would break the rules. And I now no longer know whether this instance considers the usage of variously themed slurs as against the rules, especially in contexts where they’re not direct personal user attacks.

      What is socially acceptable obviously varies widely from culture to culture, and definitely instance to instance. The brief list from the previous version helped me to identify the overall culture of the instance to figure out if I would be welcome here. Now instead I’m just not sure if a sweet Aztec decorated human skull from c. 1350CE is allowed because it is half literal human remains, half turquoise, haematite and gold mosaic.

      I appreciate that finding the balance here is very difficult. It may just be because it’s late and I’m tired, but I feel less certain about what the expectations are with this version than I did the previous. I hope you will consider returning a bit more detail to section 5.

    • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      That statement is a bit like someone saying ‘all lives matter’ in response to people saying ‘black lives matter’ after another black person is gunned down.

    • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you guys talk to a lawyer before doing this? Cause I think a lawyer would explain to you exactly why.

      You probably should have talked to a lawyer before trying to draft up a legal document.