It’s incredible what lengths people will go to experience a short high of moral superiority.

Ah this brings me back to my bachelor course on Quantum Physics. Once you end up with intermediate equations spanning a full sheet of paper you start questioning your life choices.

Ehh, shootings even happen in Europe and coincidences too.

AFAIK most typed languages have this behaviour.

I always liked Terminator because of the easy splitscreening.

Yeah I’m glad that some series (Pixel AFAIK) are now releasing slightly smaller phones, because the growth was getting ridiculous and highly impractical.

Let’s just design every website using a table again. Or even better, frames!

Way too often I’ve had websites complain that the input password is too complex, and I have to dial down the settings.

Many “space” fuel tanks have inflatable bladders inside to control the pressure and location of the fuel, especially in zero-g. Otherwise, the fuel could float away from your tank valve. It is possible that this tank has a fully or partially inflated bladder, making it much more buoyient.

I’m 100 percent certain that this is a spacecraft or launcher fuel tank. I’ve worked on reentry analyses of spacecraft fuel tanks before, and I can tell you that these very commonly survive re-entry for several reasons.

Firstly, they are by far the largest components housed inside the vehicle’s outer structure. The structure usually takes the brunt of the aerodynamic and thermal forces, protecting the tank from the largest destruction.

Secondly, the tank itself has to handle the huge fuel pressures involved (easily going towards many hundreds of atmosphere pressures!). This obviously means that incredibly tough materials have to be used.

Thirdly and finally, as can be seen in the pictures, their shape is symmetric, making the shape aerodynamically very unstable. This means the fuel tank has the tendency to tumble in the airstream. The tumbling continuously causes different parts of the tank to be exposed to the heat and other parts to cool down.

Fuel tanks are the major risk during reentry to people and other stuff on the ground, perhaps together with the massive engine blocks. To minimise the chances of hitting someone or something, re-entries are nearly always aimed at the Pacific Ocean, hence them being more likely to wash ashore in Australia.

Thanks for your explanation!

As Flash was known for it having more holes than a Swiss cheese, how is Ruffle in terms of security?

What I realised to maybe as equally damaging is if all the original NSFW subs started allowing only SFW content. This would drive the fairly isolated but big userbase of those subs away.

They act like everyone already uses reddit and the users are so addicted they’ll put up with anything.

To be honest, this may actually be true for a significant portion of the userbase.

Completely agree! Especially if it some kind of product support. I hate having to scroll through thousands of chronically ordered chat messages to find the solution to the problem I’m having.

ITT: nope, not touching anything touched by Zuckerberg.

I think it is safe to assume that’s happening now anyway. As long as anyone can access the data at the moment, they will too.

Unfortunately websites can’t really go private :P

So after June 30th we will not have an idea about the state of things anymore… :P

To be honest, I really did not know what to expect with just the title, even though it sounds incredibly straightforward.