Well how could it? Of course the DNS provider needs to know the domain you want to look up - otherwise how would they be able to look it up?
Still it would fulfill the OP’s wish: He wants to hide traffic from his ISP, so if he chooses a DNS resolver other than his ISP, and encrypt transmission, goal is achieved.
Right. I’m not saying there’s no problem coming up. Whatever’s happening in Iran might make things expensive again. I’m just saying that in comparison to previous crisis, nothing has happened YET.
Wow wow wow!
Wait, let’s do what’s always important when looking at wow wow wow graphs: Check scale. Ok, you’re looking at a period of a day. Let’s look at more.
Wow wow wow. This is what we are looking at. NOTHING happened. Really nothing.
You seem to have no clue of Discord’s business model - and those of other data scraping companies.
Too little, too late.
Oh wow, my reading competency is at max :-D Thanks.
I am really sorry that you have to live through this. I (middle-aged, white, cishet, more or less wealthy male) know that I’m super priviledged - yet reading posts like that show me that I will never be able to fully feel what you girls/women have to live through. I promise that I will fight against misogyny whereever I can.
And thank you for your post, there are really phrases that I wouldn’t have understood.
Lol
Don’t. It isn’t the internet who’s being an asshole. It’s men.
I do use QoS on my router, but that’s not what I want: I want it explicitly on OS level. If that doesn’t prioritize in the first place, it’s one hop lost with bad/missing prioritization. In my example, my bad ping was actually with enabled router-prioritization. It’s not enough.
Thanks for the links, I’ll check them out!
That makes sense. I’ll try next time. Thanks!
Thanks - how would I do that? How to choose the community from Mastodon?
Can you post new threads from Mastodon, or only comment to existing threads?
Peter Thiel will talk about himself?
NATO would break down, yes. Soldiers would lay down guns: I didn’t say anything about that.
It’s so weird people cannot see that a mutual protection treaty ends, once there’s fighting WITHIN the group - especially if it involves the strongest party. It’s so logical and clear it doesn’t even make sense to discuss.
That said, I’m outta here. Let’s hope it won’t happen.
Interesting point. From my external view, a US civil war looks to be on the verge anyway
In my oppinion exactly the opposite. EU would fall devided and be in between USA and Russia, most countries would just decide for one side in order to be “protected”.
I don’t react to orders, sorry. My time at the army is long gone. Also, the question shows that you still don’t get my point.
Most people don’t know: There’s a multiplayer variant of Civilization 1: CivNet. Barely playable today, as it’s a Windows 3.1 game. I loved it till late in the 2000s.