I would be buying. The cam I borrowed wouldn’t fit the setup I want, I just mentioned it because I want that functionality but without the hassle of pulling the SD card.
So far it doesn’t sound like what I want exists, unfortunately.
I would be buying. The cam I borrowed wouldn’t fit the setup I want, I just mentioned it because I want that functionality but without the hassle of pulling the SD card.
So far it doesn’t sound like what I want exists, unfortunately.
That essentially boils down to “build your own solution”, which under my current circumstances amounts to “don’t do it”. Not that I lack the skill or will but the spare time and energy I have is used on my baby daughter. I can’t justify rabbit holing on something like this.
It’s why I created this thread - to see if there’s a software and hardware combo that solves this with minimal additional work.
WiFi would be easily sufficient. We’re talking a distance of 10m from my router, tops.
I borrowed a camera - it’s not the one I would be using for this.
That’s why I’m asking. I haven’t bought anything yet and don’t want to get the wrong thing.
That would be possible, yep.


On what possible basis could this be legal?
I ask, as if the current US government works that way.


Best use of the IP in decades. I don’t hate the other stuff but Andor knocked my socks off.


If it can only handle tasks I can do myself it’s not very useful.


My experience has been that more complex cases it simply cannot manage. It’ll swear blind that it’s got it right and the result will be super specific to the example provided. If I knew what the strings would be exactly, in advance, I wouldn’t be writing regex 😂


That’s the thing though - I find that what it saves me in time writing it costs me in reviewing. I hate reviewing.


Shall we ask it to write functional regex too while we’re at it?


If it helps kill the damn thing, excellent.


If so, is it any good?
I imagine if one writes janky spaghetti then it’s easy to think that LLMs will result in redundancy. My experience is that they’re like having an over-enthusiastic junior who doesn’t learn. Useful when one can’t be bothered to write something with very limited scope but is quickly out of their depth on anything involved.


So you think that 90-100% of programming jobs WON’T be replaced by AI within a decade?
Stop, stop, I can’t breathe!


This really hammers home how naff the rats in Dishonored were. They’re slightly prettier than these but with eleven years of additional technological progress my expectations were a smidge higher.


I didn’t realise that the Department of Obvious was still being funded.
There’s ISS rule 34 content, after all.


Don’t support union busting asshats.
An honest answer that it’s not currently easily doable is in and of itself useful.
This is a “nice to have”. I figured I’d ask preemptively so that I didn’t go down a blind alley. Thanks!