

No, the article is just not very precise with its words. It was causing the program to panic.


No, the article is just not very precise with its words. It was causing the program to panic.


GlitchTip makes monitoring software easy. Track errors, monitor performance, and check site uptime all in one place. Our app is compatible with Sentry client SDKs, but easier to run.
For those that have no idea what GlitchTip is, it’s a service tracing service like Sentry.


This basically what I think too. I will add that I make sure other people (current and future) can enjoy it as much as possible too, so that means I will avoid anything needlessly destructive even if it is enjoyable


If the tankies had reputable sources they wouldn’t be so fringe and disliked lol


Any mention of what’s happening to the online functionality? It’s supposed to have multiplayer


So when are they releasing the servers for us to run?
Since I’m reasonably sure they won’t, anyone interested in writing a server emulator?


I guess now is better than later, but plenty of people already knew that litigious and rich companies are never good.


They do use handheld and never define it, but I can hold my laptop with my hand so I’m not sure that’s necessarily a good way of disqualifying laptops. That also seems to strictly apply to the operating system (“runs an operating system designed […] for software applications on handheld electronic devices”), which might be a fun legal quagmire as well since Linux is designed for all sorts of platforms. If I install Linux on my (formerly) Windows laptop does it suddenly become a mobile device?
It does bring up another interesting niche of computers: handheld PCs, especially handheld gaming PCs. Does this law apply to Steam Decks?
This whole thing screams “written by tech illiterates” since it seems to ignore regular computers and only focus on phones when it’s all just variations of the same thing – form factor and the software running on top isn’t very relevant to whatever goal I presume they’re trying to achieve. If they really want to collect everyone’s ID, age, and other privacy-violating information they’d be better off doing it everywhere. But maybe I shouldn’t give out advice for speed running fascism…


That was my interpretation too, except not restricted to “modern” websites. It sounds more like any website, modern or not, JS or not.
The part that is funny in that situation is that probably means web browsers are considered “app stores”. From a technical standpoint that’s actually pretty accurate (though they also handle running the “app”, unlike a regular app store), but has the fun consequence of making web browsers also “app store stores”. Most browsers can be used without an account though, so I look forward to the dumb antics companies with large legal departments come up with for this one.


Do you still hangout with your childhood friends? Would you want to marry them years later? Socioeconomic status changes how people treat you, including people you already have existing relationships with. It can also affect how you treat other people if you’re not a very good person. And unfortunately a lot of not-very-good people are rich and/or famous because it requires the willingness to exploit others for personal gain.
Imagine you’re a famous person. Many people who are less famous than you now want to be you. Many other people now dislike you just because you’re famous (or maybe because some bad thing you did got covered in the media which any regular person would get away with). How do you find people who aren’t in one of those two categories to not only befriend, but date? The easiest way is to find someone in similar circumstances as you: a similar level of famous and/or rich. Sure, there are other ways, but they’re harder.


I’ve got no clue about legal documents, especially how they work in Texas, but this seems weirdly broad and with a pretty glaring loophole.
The weirdly broad part:
(2) “App store” means a publicly available Internet website, software application, or other electronic service that distributes software applications from the owner or developer of a software application to the user of a mobile device.
This sounds like any website suddenly becomes an app store as soon as it starts distributing software for a mobile device. So (ignoring my following point), if I suddenly post my new APK on my personal site suddenly it’s an app store!? Also aren’t websites software applications? That’ll be a fun one to fight out with browsers…
(4) “Mobile device” means a portable, wireless electronic device, including a tablet or smartphone, capable of transmitting, receiving, processing, and storing information wirelessly that runs an operating system designed to manage hardware resources and perform common services for software applications on handheld electronic devices.
This sounds like it includes laptops but not desktop computers.
The glaring loophole:
(a) When an individual in this state creates an account with an app store, the owner of the app store shall use a commercially reasonable method of verification to verify the individual’s age category under Subsection (b).
So if your app store does not require an account, you do not need to verify anyone’s age!? I’m all for it but that doesn’t seem to be in the spirit of the law. F-droid and my (example) personal-site-turned-app-store rejoice!
More features that are preparing for full federation support! Exciting!


Unfortunately Nvidia is also big tech so starving out (sort of) competitors doesn’t help get rid of douchebags. It actually has the added risk of giving some of the douchebags a monopoly.
Buying one of those AMD Ryzen AI Max chips actually makes more sense now…
a joyful proof of concept
Wow that’s a sad thing to say about the second game in that (sub)series. Even the first should’ve been more than a proof of concept. It would be excusable for a $20 early access game on Steam to be a tech demo of this calibre, but not a $85 (CAD) game. It does interest me enough to consider eventually picking up a used copy do dump to my Steam Deck, which is about the highest complement I can offer a Nintendo game.


Apparently genocide is ok but mass surveillance isn’t, so they’ll continue to do business with Israel but just won’t let one unit use it.
Microsoft must completely stop all service to everyone in Israel. Anything less is still supporting genocide.
Varying levels of disappointed for me.
Others elected a very pro-suburbia mayor who is slowly making our city worse for people who rely on transit (like me).
The provincial government is somehow worse. The leader is very corrupt, which anyone voting should’ve predicted since he used to be a drug dealer… (and also this is his second term)
Federal government just gave a standing ovation to Charlie Kirk so… yeah they’re winning for being the worst right now. Sadly enough that was the only leader I actually voted in support of. Every politician in the room when that happened should resign. It’s now the second time many of them have applauded a Nazi in that room (and this time they definitely knew he was a Nazi).


The actual study (I think) since I couldn’t find it in the article https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(25)00328-4/fulltext
Seems pretty solid though it is just analyzing pre-existing data. It corroborates similar findings from studies looking at other datasets.


To be fair, people shouldn’t be relying on a single study to be informed on what diet is best for them. It’s also unclear whether it was specifically the vegan part that reduces hot flashes. The studied diet had multiple changes compared to the average diet, including vegan. It would be interesting to have a follow up study to figure out which dietary change reduces hot flashes, or if it requires all of the changes.


Technically free education and universal healthcare are more communist than socialist (as in, they achieve communal control/ownership over them instead of just social ownership). But broadly, communism is a form of socialism so…
And before anyone says that either of those examples aren’t controlled/owned by the government, let me point out that having a monopoly on who pays for something is an awful lot of control over it. You even see this with (nongovernmental) health insurance; they exert a lot of control on what doctors do by saying what they will and won’t pay for. Ownership is just the end game of control.
All of the camera angles are on the same block and many of the vehicles stop there, so they are clearly allowed to stop. Plenty of other people were in the street in the other shots. The driver of the vehicle clearly was intending to clip the person since the driver swerved after hitting them (watch the front wheel), as though they wanted to hit them but not run over them. Anyone with empathy would’ve swerved first.