Killing in the Name is the right answer, I feel.

I had already read that book prior to my teacher reading it aloud in class. She couldn’t read that chapter, so I volunteered to, having already had my trauma from the scene. We didn’t end up watching the movie, though.

I never got plastering logos for whatever brands you love to consume on everything you own. Like buying decals and stickers and shit to put all over your car, laptop, whatever else. Since when do we pay to advertise for brands…?

Another good video discussing the origins of Yahweh/YHWH

That’s your only contribution? Cool. Objections duly noted.

Proofreading your own work without a significant time gap is pretty useless. You’ll catch a few obvious errors, but approaching the same problem in the same mental space tends to lead to the same thought patterns, tends to lead to making or overlooking the same mistakes.

You’ll do a bit better reapproaching the subject a few days later. It’s almost, but not quite, like reading a new piece of writing. In my experience, comments are set and forget, unless you’re obsessive like me and enjoy rereading your old shit.

By far the most effective proofreading, though, is an Editor. There’s a reason it’s a paid position for anyone who makes a living writing. A completely different person will read the text more as-is, without accidentally interpreting it how they INTENDED it to be written. This will catch far more errors, but isn’t really practical for shit posting in social media. The closest you’ll get is someone calling out a typo or grammatical error.

As long as the intent of the message is clear, it passes the bar for acceptable social media content. We’re not writing PhD theses, we’re just having fun discussions. We’re not writing a paper meant to be readable to someone independently, we’re engaging in dialogue and can easily ask the other person to clarify.

TL;DR high-level proofreading and error correcting isn’t really as viable on social media as it is formal writing, nor is it really necessary as long as the message received is the message intended.

I’d love a single giant lady to finger…

What were we talking about again?

Get my resume together

It’s quite simply what’s on people’s minds right now. It was a major event, it outlines some of the systemic inequalities, and people are interested in the subject.

Y’all bots?

Mate, they made a joke. Kinda like the ones the celebrated George Carlin made.

Where people walk, but also sight lines. Particularly in bedrooms.

We still have our bread and digital circuses. But the GOP is rapidly eroding our digital circuses, so it’s becoming easier and easier to pull away and live in the real world. They’re authors of their own misery, eventually.

Except that it is always the better option. There is NO scenario where having two insane people running around in 2 ton vehicles is better than one. Let the person go, get a helicopter following him (it should be easy if he’s driving erratically) and apprehend when he inevitably stops. Police have resources besides sheer brute force, they should use THOSE rather than the gun and the police chase.

You say “the issue is the person could get out of sight of cameras”. Meaning they potentially get away with a crime.

The implication is that you want these chases to continue.

My point is, I’d RATHER see the person go free than even POTENTIALLY run the risk of a high speed chase that necessarily endangers people not involved.

That’s why you’re getting downvoted. You’re implying you want high speed chases.

Which is preferable to running down an innocent person in a pointless chase. Where’s the issue, exactly?

Did you understand what they said? Great! They did perfectly fine then. Waste less energies.

Why do you think they have time to sleep?

Well how about that. It’s also my birthday. Happy birthday, Leni

People want a lot of things. Doesn’t make them good, beneficial to society, or anything else.