Yes.

Yes there is. The wobbly table theroem. https://people.math.harvard.edu/~knill/teaching/math1a_2011/exhibits/wobblytable/

K-hive is now declaring Harris was never a prosecutor?

There isn’t currently a scientific consensus, as wikipedia should be pointing out, with studies differing massively depending mostly on what model of soil uptake and preservation in atmosphere is used.

We know that the majority of in air debris would not come from the explosion, which is designed to minimize fallout in all modern weapons and deployment models, but from the resulting fires. We also know from previous tests the resulting fires don’t actually last long as they tend to burn through areas quickly.

In short it’s not a sure thing, and if any cooling effect does occur it wouldn’t start to touch the average heating we’ve introduced through climate change.

Both candidates fall under the latter category. An AG that was a prosecutor with a history of perpetuating the war on drugs and arguing in court innocent men should stay imprisoned because prison labor is good for the economy, who was also vice president to one of the most right wing men ever elected?

That’s literally the state half of the fascist alignment of corporate and state power.

Well time to find out if Iran has a nuke and if we get to solve climate change by inducing a nuclear winter(yes I know nuclear winter isn’t real).

Technically yes, but the two largest want to end the genocide by continuing it to its final solution.

No, people fleeing their country instead of improving it tend to be liberals and other such conservatives.

deleted by creator

Wikipedia is not a source, and your article does not support the claim that Apple, the most profitable tech company, is heavily subsidized by tax payers.

You didn’t cite a source for your ridiculous claim, I don’t need to cite a source in my correction. Reported for incivility though.

That’s nice, but in regards to spacex musk just repeats what the company managers put out.

I’m pretty sure Apple getting your tax money is something your politicians wanted, not Apple. They’re one of the wealthiest companies on the planet and have more cash on hand than any other company as a matter of policy.

Moreover, Apple is a capitalist entity, not a state owned entity, they go where they can sell. That’s not really the US anymore. China has more middle class tech consumers than the north American continent has people.

Ireland, thanks to it’s tax haven status, is home to most US tech companies. https://www.theverge.com/2021/10/7/22715229/ireland-status-tax-haven-google-facebook-apple

Israel doing war crimes? I’m shocked. Good thing there’s nothing more that America: World Police loves than stopping war crimes. I’m sure they get right on this and invade Israel, since they’re doing far more and far worsewar crimes than any nation the US has invaded in the last 79 years.

Every good nation is politically hostile to the US, it’s history of genocide and unrestrained war makes it a social pariah that is only tolerated by countries so that they don’t get invaded.

That being said Apple is headquartered in Ireland like all multinational tech companies. It was founded in the US, but legally it’s an Irish company.

Also that no regard for IP thing mostly affects foreign IP, you can just apply for a Chinese patent and get legal protection there, China just doesn’t trust other countries patent and IP protection processes, which is especially fair for the US, the land of patent and copyright trolls.

The only functional American space launch company isn’t a meme, even if their overpaid mascot is.

Super sketchy a tech company expanded into the largest and wealthiest consumer base on the planet?

If I produce a magical killing device and sell it knowing it can only kill, not only does it not have any other purpose, but actively cannot be used except to kill, am I at fault for deaths that device causes regardless of if I was the one in possession?

You can’t really say it’s fair use, especially for summaries or use as answers to questions if the original purpose of the work is the same.

And that’s without approaching licensing issues which override free use and copyright law.

I can’t feed publicly available code that’s license as gpl into an llm and not license the resulting code as gpl.