Edit: words, sentence structure

So you want us to reward genocide by voting for Trump or Harris…

Logic.

If you vote, I say raise your standards and vote for a third party.

Do not reward those that are for another genocide and for more forever wars.

How?

Voting for Harris or Trump, you will be rewarding another genocide and more forever wars.

The duopoly only helps the owner-class, while it continues to pander to the working class with crumbs.

I disagree again with your framing and smearing.

I don’t think we will agree on this; our experiences and world views differ when it comes to culture wars and identity politics.

I say to continue building the working class grass roots movement so as to destroy the status quo and push for a better society for Americans and the working class of the world.

Thanks for the chat, and I hope we may unite on other topics!

I disagree with your framing and talking points.

You seem to be going back to the circle jerk of the duopoly, smearing and lying to push your moral high horse and victimhood.

I am not for sacrificing scapegoats and the like; I am for the struggles of the working class; we do that by building up grass roots movements and uniting, not by diving ourselves.

I am for the working class, not the owner-class and their lackeys that help divide us with culture wars and identity politics.

It is interesting, but I still see it as jargon and a distraction for the issues that will unite the working class.

Intersectionality is a sociological analytical framework for understanding how groups’ and individuals’ social and political identities result in unique combinations of discrimination and privilege. Examples of these factors include gender, caste, sex, race, ethnicity, class, sexuality, religion, disability, height, age, and weight.

Crumbs are crumbs for the working class.

That is why I have this as my banner:

Fighting for minorities is not a monopoly that the Democrats hold; similar to their support for the working class, it is all an act so as to fearmonger and fundraise.

Some learned this from the Obama failures, others from the Bernie Sanders Era failures, and some learned before and others will learn after another status quo president is elected.

Raise your standards and check out third parties so we may continue to fight against the status quo.

I disagree with your framing.

You are bringing in talking points from the duopoly, which I am against and do not support.

Fighting for minorities has always been the role of grass-roots movements and third parties.

Bringing the working class and local communities together to push past the status quo is the long-term goal, instead of being stuck on duopoly talking points that continue to be problems decades later.

All is well.

We all go down the rabbit holes on our own time.

And we will continue to support them 100% of the way, so as to keep the duopoly and the status quo of supporting genocides all over the world.

More forever wars where the working class continue to be killed off, while the owner-class and their lackeys rake in their profits and natural resources.

You should see what happens when political tribalism takes place in the United States.

Strong emotions and financial strain with the working class at an all-time high, disdain towards other groups, and fights break out.

Assassination attempts and murder of activists and politicians due to disagreements.

I think it goes back to dividing the working class and keeping us entertained so we don’t pay attention to the status quo.

Well, if you fear change from the status quo, nothing will ever be viable.

We need to be willing to fight for what we demand; that means getting over the fearmongering pushed by the duopoly.

These are culture war and identity politics, used to divide the working class again and again.

The duopoly and the owner-class will always have minorities to use as scapegoats.

roe becomes durable law in my lifetime, a Democrat will do it.

It raises too much money for them, so I am doutful on that part.

I have gone through many rabbit holes since the Bernie Sanders Era, lies, and failures.

I see it as just another culture war and identity politics talking point so as to divide the working class.

I am more for focusing on the class war, and we start that by stopping ourselves from falling for the duopoly talking points and excuses by being their apologetics.

You can continue helping the duopoly fundraise with these culture war and identity politics talking points, but I don’t like to keep my head in the sand when I already when down the rabbit holes.

I don’t think it’s relevant to compare abortion pre 2000 to post.

hahaha, wow.

Anyway, here ya go:

@russelldobular

[Image, image to text below]

Screenshot:

History of Democrats Refusing To Codify Roe v Wade when they could have:

Jimmy Carter: Supermajority 1977-1979, Majority 79-81

Bill Clinton: Full Majority 1993-1995

Barack Obama: Supermajority for 72 days, Majority from 2009-2011. (plus independents who agreed to vote for the Freedom of Choice Act Obama promised to codify “first thing” after winning the election. But, Obama quickly said after winning, it’s not his “highest legislative priority.”)

Joe Biden: Full Majority 2021-2023

When Democrats say “we didn’t have enough votes” and then fundraise for anti-abortion dems over pro-choice dems, they are telling you they don’t support choice.

Source: https://lemmy.world/post/18990596

I suggest checking out how many times Roe v. Wade could have been codified by the Democrats over the past couple of decades.

Caution: you may not like what you learn in that rabbit hole as well, though.

I disagree.

Policy wise, more for the owner-class and less for the working class.

Crumbs here and there by both, but ultimately the status quo will continue.

I agree; swing states seem to be the only ones that matter when you vote duopoly and all you care about is “winning.”

I, on the other hand, prefer to have standards, so stop wasting your vote on the status quo, be it Harris or Trump, you will be rewarding genocide.