![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Almost a troll-like insistence on lack of nuance to an extremely complex situation
Removed by mod
This is what it takes to cool an economy. Better bankruptcies than widespread unemployment
I believe black people’s lives matter. I hold that view so strongly that I’m willing to shout it in the streets. Does that make part of a political extremist movement?
That’s quite the false equivalence you’ve made there
I’ll take both please
Pretty sure Whole Foods had shitty conservative executives back then too didn’t they?
Is this in a museum somewhere? Would be cool to see up close
Because they don’t care about quality in depth content. They’re just in it for the clicks. Probably had an algorithm fill in the remaining paragraphs
Would this look any different if it displayed average salary instead of iPhone price as a percentage of average salary?
Thank you. As someone who knows nothing about that religion this headline was extremely confusing to me
Here’s todays winner for most unintelligible title
Thanks for sharing your experience! Those examples don’t seem so subtle at all! Sorry you have to live with that shit
Right? Name one thing, anywhere in humanity, that somebody isn’t profiting from
Real talk - how often do you experience overt, interpersonal racism? How often do you experience more subtle “accidental” racism?
What part of the country are you in?
Even accounting for how car-centric US cities are, I agree with that commenter. Yeah it may be hard to get downtown from outlying neighborhoods without a car, but sidewalks have ramps and building have access. Hell, the parking lots have designated parking spaces. Not true at all in most European cities
Edit: I guess it’s worth a little more nuance than just limping all European cities in the same category. The wealthier northern cities have definitely caught up a bit (though they all still have buildings that are completely inaccessible). The real problems are the southern cities like Rome, Madrid, Athens, Lisbon etc.
I guess my point is that the big debate is whether women should be able to get an abortion at all or not. I believe conservative Christian leaders are resolute in stating that any abortion is anti-Christian and anti-conservative, so you might be less of one that you think.
Fair answer. There’s no denying that men should have a lot of (and a lot more) accountability in pregnancy, but that’s kind of beside the point in the debate around abortion rights.
I don’t think most people would defend the right to an abortion once the fetus becomes viable, nor do I think many women get abortions so late. I don’t have the stats on that, but I’m pretty sure that’s all just extreme scare-mongering from the anti-abortion lobby. They’re trying to prevent any abortion and use extremely rare/non-existent scenarios to push that agenda.
There is also a huge range of scenarios under which a women might want an abortion. I have a personal example. A very close family member of mine had an abortion when she and her husband were actively trying to have a second child. The fetus was not growing and multiple doctors confirmed that the pregnancy was going to result in a miscarriage at some point, but it was unclear when that would happen. Instead of waiting potentially months for a surprise miscarriage to happen, she decided to have an at-home abortion using mifepristone. It was purely out of bodily autonomy. Now conservative Christians are trying to take that right away from her and thousands of women in the same position.
Not that I know of, but it wouldn’t be odd if they did because, you know, all the murder