I don’t hate react content hypothetically. However the modern standpoint of watching something entertaining without proper credit or any transformative input is really dumb. At least actually provide critique, enhanced understanding, or deeper analysis to the work instead of spending the whole time going “yep. Cool. Wow.”
Thanks! Looks neat
Did you manually add a shutterstock watermark?
I think that would include any non-religion specific insanity
That bird is just doing the legend of Zelda shopkeeper animation from a different angle.
Yeah. What’s even happening. It’s like it was put together by one intern who didn’t know the animation software.
That episode sticks in my brain like no other piece of media ever has
Yeah. It’s my favorite at the moment, but it doesn’t seem well maintained
If Google wasn’t so blatantly malicious in their advertising practices then I would gladly pay for YouTube premium. However, their current business model of “take any and every bit of data on them to sell more product” is morally repugnant. Subsequently, I feel no shame in blocking ads and using invidious to avoid giving them even a cent of revenue.
I agree. I use gnome on nix and it has been great, especially on a touchpad.
I’m immediately killed with a flamethrower or hit in the head by a magically teleported sniper bullet.
I thought it was just a fun photo of a cat. It’s not worth being so upset over. Let people have their fun.
Regardless of the number of people involved in this conflict, nuclear escalation could only increase the number of deaths. There is no world in which atomic weapons solve this issue
Yes, although I still love the idea of Davy Jones running around with tiny water buckets strapped to each of his feet.
No, I agree. I liked the decision to not have Davy jones be entirely villainous. Although I did take issue with the inconsistency of the story later on. Like, if Jones can stand in a bucket of sea water to go on land, then can’t he just fill some sealed shoes with water and walk on land? It’s all rather ambiguous.
His physical security video after the CTO of square died was not great. It felt too soon to be using his death to spread a message, and it relies far too heavily on the hypothetical idea that a gun could have saved him from harm. I understand that yes, a gun may have been able to prevent the attack, but it felt sort of ridiculous to insinuate that a gun is necessary to avoid a situation like this.
Invidious link: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=KbfKSXlDeIQ
YouTube link:
Agreed. Also, I think it was quite the power move to have a character so evil that they cut out their own heart, then made the actual villain a tiny British man who embodies capitalism.
Once when I was younger I was seperated from my family on Halloween. I panicked a bit and walked up the street towards where I thought they had gone. Then, I turned left, and came onto yet another street packed with Halloween celebrators. However, nobody was talking. I mean it was silent enough for me to hear my own footsteps and brushing past people in the crowd. For comparison, the other nearby streets were too loud to talk without shouting. I finally found the other members of my group after walking for a solid 5 minutes, and they all seemed to think I had never left.