Not to mention India and China vs. the US

Total emissions would tell a different story but population is not the only factor here

Yes but I also imagine many of the males in that picture died or were injured

You keep using all the classic rhetorical terms reserved for people who have argued themselves into a corner. You’re not very good at this. cIaO CiAo

Bad arguments like “the president of the United States tried to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.” Man the gaslighting from you is wild.

I don’t dislike nuclear, I dislike bad arguments and bad decision making. The president wields enormous power over the stability and infrastructure required for nuclear to be safe and sustainable. You cannot have watched the debate last night, or the events of Jan 6, and feel confidence that anyone involved can be trusted with a goldfish, much less consistently providing a stable nation capable of securing nuclear plants.

If your argument is “don’t worry a sitting president may have staged an insurrection, but it was incompetent so it’s totally ok to leave him in charge of nuclear plants” then yeah, I think that’s a bad argument. And embarrassing

The sitting president did it…the commander in chief. I get you like nuclear but this is embarrassing

That bunch of idiots are the ones who control the tanks, artillery, planes, and funding for infrastructure that is required to keep nuclear plants from melting down

We just had a failed insurrection four years ago, wtf are you doing pretending like this can’t happen

Nuclear power relies on stable, safe, and advanced nations not like, I dunno, starting a land war in Europe that threatens to flood the continent with fallout.

Oh so it’s not meant to be quantitative but instead is meant as “most” to “almost everyone.” Makes sense, I thought he was doing the math and I was very confused lol

Not that I disagree but can someone explain how one congressperson losing takes the percentage control from 85-90% to 98%…?

If they are checking data brokers or aggregators it’s not really a background check. Carefully read any consent you give for a potential employer to perform a background check. Look for the records they are accessing and make a determination based on that language.

It is possible that some vendor is the space incorporates data brokers into their service, and that’s hard to tell. But they still should ask for your consent, I believe.

I wouldn’t argue “old people suffer from cognitive impairment” is a valid criticism of a politician without clinical evidence that that politician is suffering from cognitive impairment. This just smacks of ageism.

Were the people who asked you happy with the result? The question is less is your art good enough - the question is will people pay for it, and how much. Best way to find out is to start trying! You can do it!

What an odd and unnecessarily hostile response to horse armor discussions, full of rebuttals to things I didn’t say. If you’re looking for a meaningless fight you didn’t find one.

Yes but they are quite different. For starters, the horse armor was purely cosmetic. Second, Oblivion was the game that really made it normal and mainstream. Oblivion was far more popular than NWN and almost any other fantasy game of that era that I can remember. It certainly commanded a huge audience as the successor to Morrowind, and a technological breakthrough in terms of look, polish, mechanics, and scale. I think it was really the first of the AAA first person fantasy genre, and for them to normalize cosmetic only DLC was different.

Neat, it’s still spying

Ok, I didn’t ask that, though. That is a completely different discussion that no one is having.

Ok but they are administering and moderating their instance according to their political beliefs about a specific nation. They’re not defending China’s economic policies at Tiananmen Square or their notions on tariffs with Uyghurs. I don’t think you answered the question in the way you think you did.

What’s that got to do with censoring some discussions about some countries?