How did you get that point from my comment?

So… that means one side of Gaza is sensible and the other isn’t? That’s the only take after their last comment.

Just pointing out that with their last comment, their other point can be taken as one side being sensible, while the other isn’t.

What does that have to do with boot licking?

Fantastic point, right up until that last sentence. But I guess people just want to circle jerk eh?

Man your comment was really impartial and well thought out, until that last comment. So close…

restaurant manager -manager

That shouldn’t turn up no results. That poster is assuming A LOT. It also looked like a blog post and is 30% ads, what kind of source is that? The link provided by Schmidt shows that most Booleans do work on Google and is newer than your posted link as well, as well as provided by one of their engineers… so they should be taken as more knowledgeable then… a blog post to from a random person.

Because the search will turn up results that aren’t related to managers, there will absolutely be results. The only people who would assume there would be no results are people who think search engines only return proper results, and incorrectly assume Boolean are true AND, OR and NOT. When they have never been.

The issue in case you haven’t figured it out, is assuming how stuff should work and being ignorant instead of learning.

Most Booleans work on Google and have existed for decades, claiming they “don’t” or “don’t work” just means you don’t understand what the point of them has always been.

There’s a crap ton of duplicates?

I am a compliance expert.

Yet you claim there is two party consent for video, won’t provide anything to support that claim, and the one link you did specifically says it doesn’t…

. I too am confident in my assessment of the legal situation.

People can be confidently wrong, like in this case…

Awwwwhhh I upset muffin by using logic and reason to refute them.

Is it so odd, that someone knows how to read and understand code and law books? It’s part of any tradesperson training.

I know it’s not a thing, from plenty of research into my own camera systems, and I am confident that I know the results I found are correct, because I know how to understand code and law books.

And no it doesn’t, but the lack of any results shows that you’re full of fucking shit.

Again, just because someone swears doesn’t mean they are being aggressive! It’s common repertoire for a lot of working people! Sorry princess!

I’ve never heard of that before… and Google shows zero results for “states with two party consent for video recording” all links are for audio… what state… please… how many times do I need to ask nicely so we can solve this?

Just because you’re wrong and got called out doesn’t mean the other person is being aggressive lmfao.

No… your link even specifies that….

L

O

Fucking

L

It’s the internet, people can swear dude.

That applies to audio… not video recordings mate.

Why are you telling me to chill? Because I used a bloody swear word…?

What country? I’m sure there’s exceptions that you don’t know about, the laws normally don’t disallow their use, it’s in how the data is stored.

A security system that doesn’t record, but is watched by someone would be legal anywhere for example. Just the fact that there’s one, means sweet fuck all.

What places?

Usually it’s a misinterpretation of the law, they are not meant to interfere with security and law enforcement. There’s always exceptions, usually it’s how they trigger or store the data. If it’s automatically wiped, usually no laws have been broken for example.

The spherical sponge, Chondrocladia sp nov, is covered in tiny hooks that trap prey, which is different to how sponges usually feed. Generally, sea sponges are passive filter feeders.

It does though.

Removed by mod

No, even ODB from the 70s records you max reached speed, if you’ve hit the governer/rev limiter and how many times.

It’s nothing modern, modern just does it more frequent, more situations, more information, more data points, and mandatory black boxes.

And many vehicles from 2000 onwards have dedicated EDR boxes, what make and model and trim is your 2012?

So sounds like you don’t quite know what’s going on under your hood there ;)

You’ll be surprised, they take snapshots at certain points. In a collision all vehicles will store last 5 or so seconds of data, speed, see if brakes are engaged, stuff like that, it’s all used in collision investigations. There’s not a single car I think that’s doesn’t do this. As I said, it’s in some form, but your vehicle does know if you’ve sped if it has an obd on it.

What do you think basic OBD stuff is? It’s all that information and that’s used to see if anything’s wrong with the vehicle.

Those still have an ECU that stores most of the same data. It knows you speed, it knows how hard you brake, etc. anything with an OBD will store data. And that’s carssince the 70s

year of the

it’s been decades.

Should we tell them?

Classic case of confusing infamous and famous.