That’s for instances, not accounts, no?

What is probably needed is a 3rd party vouching account system. A bit like how email accounts are used today, but with a back-channel that allow you to get reputation from the places you join with that account and that in turn makes it easier to join other places.

The 80% LLM applications doesn’t seem to have reached Lemmy yet. For us it is more like 10% or so. But yeah, it is getting harder to distinguish these.

Far right racist, says far right racist things, news at 12! /s

please post this kind of questions in !askeurope@lemmy.world

In rare cases when commentary is provided.

Most trade journal posts would also fall into the not of general interest category.

Disagreements over how to handle posts & comments about the situation in the middle east. This community is just among the most exposed & english speaking communities on Feddit.org thus it has the most conflict potential.

No

The reduction of MAU here is IMO mostly due to a large instance defederating from feddit.org and related drama posts that specifically highlighted this community as a reason for defederation.

There has been significantly more of such posts in recent weeks 🤷

And posting lobby outlet press releases with zero commentary is discuraged regardless of the actual topic.

And yes, this community got momentum (despite multiple attempts to discredit the moderators here) because we actually curate it, and I plan to continue doing so.

Sure, but posting lobby outlet press releases of arms dealers is not a close look (especially when there is no commentary at all), and in any case it should be done in a seperate community.

So far this was just a friendly moderator notice to think about what articles to post here. If you want to post defense industry insider news, create a community for it.

One of the many other defense industry news articles recently posted here.

Look, if you don’t like our moderation here feel free to use one of the many other Europe communities. We curate the links posted here based on general interest, and defense industry insider news are not that.

News about what specific chassis a new tank design presented by some European arms dealer has are not of general interest 🤷

Your last posts were all defense industry insider news that are of little interest for the general public.

So what would you call someone trying to divert the discussion about Chinese agression towards Taiwan with an entirely unrelated agression the US does on the other side of the world? That is clearly a “but what about” argument… that is indeed weak, lazy and interlectually insulting.

The interlectual hoops you are jumping through to justify your cognitive disonance is truly astonishing 🤡

The Taiwanese nation is a historical and present fact as I have clearly laid out above. Your semantic arguments hold little water and arguing that only the indigious population has a right to claim nationhood is a very transparent excuse to deny the existing local population the right to self-governance (which they already peacefully do together with the indiginous population).

So you were lying when you said earlier:

I would LOVE to see to Taiwan decolonized

And it is full mask off imperialism, where you think it is justified for one nation to subjugate another. Great that you are finally honest here with anyone reading this 😏