What the heck is an “open world dress-up game” lol

The only reason I’m not surprised is because this was basically going to kill the game. Nobody was going to play it after this change, and I don’t think that’s something Sony wanted to risk.

I’m not entirely shocked by this

Only if you get those responsibilities by staying in the same company rather than getting hired in the same role by another one

lol prolly

Haha

Freaking love this game

Those protections include setting a baseline for minimum terms and conditions with regards to AI voice replicas, along with requiring actors to authorise their voice for use in such projects and negotiate around how and where their digital double is used. The agreement also allows performers to opt out of letting their AI voice be used in the future if they decide against it later on.

In other words, rather than opposing the replacement of actors by AI as a whole, the deal looks to try and put control of any AI recreations in the hands of actors through formal licensing - wresting back some power from AI tools that harvest thousands of creators’ work without any kind of credit or compensation.

That all seems very fair to me.

Yep

This is so cool

It has to be in general cuz Paramount has been pretty good at putting out physical media, even for streaming exclusives most people don’t watch like Joe Pickett and Rabbit Hole

Hasn’t Paramount actually been really good at selling physical media? There are literally 4K steelbooks for Star Trek: Strange New Worlds

And slowly but surely the entire Star Trek franchise climbs higher and higher on my list of physical media to purchase

Ooh. Good catch!

Probably 😂

Such a sad story. Glad they were found guilty.

First of all, I think it’s a bit faulty to say that progress is good by default, as it is only good if it leaves society in a better state than it was before.

I’d actually argue that progressivism is, in general, pretty regressive, rather that leading to progress, and has led to things like sexism and racism coming back into favor, rather than falling out of favor. This has given us a society where there is now a fair bit of progress needed to get back to where MLK wanted us to be, with people being judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin (or their genetalia). There are other things too, such as a return to science, the presumption of innocence before being proven guilty in the eyes of the general public, and more that need to be strived for, but progressivism attempts to take us backwards in regards to those things, rather than taking us forward.

Ah,that makes a lot more sense.

I see. For the record I don’t like progressivism, but it’s not supposed to be a dig at her, just saying that she’s at a protest that is aligned with her ideology, and it makes no sense to be mad at her for attending a protest or rally that’s for a cause that she supports. Seems like a dumb thing to complain about to me.

Progressive