So, what you’re saying is … sometimes there’s a movie… I won’t say a film, ‘cause, what’s a film? But sometimes, there’s a movie. And I’m talkin’ about The Big Lebowski here. Sometimes, there’s a movie, well, it’s not the movie for its time and place.
Filthy hobbitses
I eat tuna often, and I’ve never noticed anyone that can’t draw separate conclusions based entirely for reasons without cause or makes little sense. Evidence of heavy metal caused features resemble natural pathways just fine. It’s like spending worry about higher lead or cadmium. Who does it?
Floog floog floog floog
I do appreciate comments like these, which is unfortunate; I would have enjoyed replying to this with “Jark!”
Seems pretty good for 1.1 x .9, and for .9 x .8
I guess values must be pretty close
Pumpkin pie is always made with squash. Occasionally, those squash are pumpkins
After some thought, I’ve decided that we should refer to this apparent lapse by journalists as “Oceangate-gate-gate”
After decades of journalists attaching the suffix “gate” to anything even remotely scandalous, I was disappointed that I never heard anyone embrace the full stupidity of this practice by referring to this story as “Oceangate-gate”
Were any of them any good?
The Matrix
Thanks to your comments, I went looking at more about Jupiter’s influence on us and read that most of the other planets are more in line with Jupiter’s orbital plane than the Sun’s equatorial plane (which sounds impressive, but maybe only makes complete sense since the planets would have all initially formed from the same disk). Anyway, thanks
I don’t know. I don’t think we should make excuses for Jupiter just because of its size. Pluto’s doing the best it can. Could any of us do any better, so far out from the sun?
Exactly. That’s also why Jupiter, which shares its orbit with thousands of asteroids, isn’t a planet either.
I know. Nothing stresses me out more than weighing mice
Eventually, they became confident that they were working with new material from two fragmentary Euripides plays, Polyidus and Ino. Twenty-two of the lines were previously known in slightly varied versions, but “80 percent was brand-new stuff,” Gibert says.
This cleared up my first thought: how can you tell the lost writings of Euripides from the lost writings of Sophocles (or from the writings of playwrights that haven’t survived at all). I mean, unless these are sizeable fragments, it might not be easy to tell even Aeschylus from Euripides
While a tool that extends your reach is useful, when dealing with a difficult to reach spider, your best asset is the element of surprise!