Full time smug prick
People playing fast and loose with the terms “discrimination” and “racism” really grind my gears. We are talking about centuries of fucking crimes against humanity, and some sad little fuckers have the nerve to conflate reparations with the very crimes that were committed.
Don’t forget to listen to some Doom while you’re at it.
Actually resistance in concentration camps is an untold saga. The most famous example is the inverse “B” in “Arbeit Macht Frei”, but there where more examples, and less subtle too, like full blown antifascist banners in barracks, even sabotage and espionage in the gas chambers. Never give up!
Ah, I get you. I myself thought the HXC logo with the X in a circle (which stands for hardcore) was Cyrillic for “sound”, or someone simply told me and I believed them.
This is correct, but there was a revival in the UK in the 1980’s. It was the latter that influenced the ska-punk genre.
I declared an internal data breach, submitted it to the fed—as you legally must in this country—and shit hit the fan for that department.
You are a legend
Is it like…an app?
Restoring Meritocracy since 1998 give or take.
We aren’t special.
You should dial this statement way up. The population of Lemmy is definitely not a representative demographic. Nor is Reddit’s.
Some were vigilant enough to note that a group of Nazis chanting “Lügenpresse” at a Trump rally meant his “fake news” slogan was a Nazi dogwhistle. Or as Musk’s AI Grok is now conditioned to parrot: The Legacy Media.
According to the article has antisemitic connotation and it was ubiquitous in Third Reich propaganda.
There is a conceptual distinction: Encryption in transit vs. encryption at rest. You may send the packets encrypted to the server, but if they are not encrypted on the server’s file system, anyone can read them.
The real question is, why do you think governments make such a big fuss about citizens having access to military grade encryption?
There have been audits of e2ee implementations, and the algorithms used also have some objective properties. I don’t think that I have ever heard in cryptography discussions that backdoors are so widespread that the discussion is moot. I have only heard, time and time again, the opposite.
Even Apple, in this very occasion, opted to ditch the service rather than backdoor it, and in fact takes the UK to court over this. I think that the opinion that this is all for show is a tad wild, and not very well supported in this occasion.
Like every cryptology book starts with the adage “There is cryptography that prevents your little sister from reading your mail, and cryptography that prevents the government from reading your mail, and we will talk about the latter.”
On the other hand, not all implementations are created equal. Telegram was recently under fire, and there is a lot of variance in e2ee implementations in XMPP clients, IIRC.
At this point you are allowed to put “George Soros” in scare quotes too. It is a good time to be alive. /S
You expect him to conceive that different words mean different things?
I was halfway in reading this, and laughing at every fucking period. Then I said “That’s it, this is ‘Not The Onion’ material.”
OK now that arstechnica has written about it, shills might stop nagging in the comments about my titling. LMAO